good
trans fats are fucking useless and there is no point of using them.
trans fats are fucking useless and there is no point of using them.
Right, because being against banning it necessarily means that I want trans fats.
We should make it illegal to call random black people NIGGERS. Oh, you're against that? Then obviously you want to go out and call random black people NIGGERS, you racist.
Don't eat at the restaurant if they use trans-fats.
It's not that fucking difficult, you pink-stained piece of shit.
Don't eat at the restaurant if they use trans-fats.
It's not that fucking difficult, you pink-stained piece of shit.
So how long before Col moves away from California?
There is an alternative. It's called judiciary doctrine. Set precedence in litigation by demonstrating that the trail of causation can actually be traced back to trans-fats. If that can be done, then you have judiciary doctrine that will deter companies from selling trans-fats.its a big deal cuz its a very unhealthy and shitty alternative to normal cooking oil you idiot.
if mcdonalds released a burger that was proven to kill you in 2 days after eating it but the average person wasn't aware of this would you still whine "wah nanny law"?
why not just ban fried food altogether?
You can't figure out for yourself if something is fried?As long as they tell me it's been fried I don't see a problem with it.
If a restaurant is serving trans fat without telling people. . I guess I can kind of support this.
There is an alternative. It's called judiciary doctrine. Set precedence in litigation by demonstrating that the trail of causation can actually be traced back to trans-fats. If that can be done, then you have judiciary doctrine that will deter companies from selling trans-fats.
Just like it's not illegal to sell a home without a gate to the pool yard ... but generally speaking, nobody is going to have a pool without a gate because the pool is an attractive nuisance, and the homeowner can face litigation even if an individual trespasses and drowns in the pool.
Seriously, this worship of the state is fucking pathetic.
You can't figure out for yourself if something is fried?
I'm against banning it based on politico-economic principles. What principles of yours call for the banning of such admitted innocuous substances?even if you dont want to eat trans fats why in the fuck do YOU not want it banned?
I really want to know
the government finds something that is 100% useless and does nothing for anyone excpet BAD things ... why the fuck would you care if its banned?
Are you a restaurant owner and you are worried about the cost of not using trans fats ?
Tort law isn't exactly your forte, apparently.You Nazi. Keep the courts off our laws. It's the duty of the legislative to create the law and the executive to sign or veto it. Fuck activist courts.
Dumby Dooby is all libertarian until the government makes his fat ass eat healthy. Then he goes running to some unelected tyrant.
There is an alternative. It's called judiciary doctrine. Set precedence in litigation by demonstrating that the trail of causation can actually be traced back to trans-fats. If that can be done, then you have judiciary doctrine that will deter companies from selling trans-fats.
Just like it's not illegal to sell a home without a gate to the pool yard ... but generally speaking, nobody is going to have a pool without a gate because the pool is an attractive nuisance, and the homeowner can face litigation even if an individual trespasses and drowns in the pool.
Seriously, this worship of the state is fucking pathetic.
You can't figure out for yourself if something is fried?