No, and even if you did, nobody would have cared.
Hugh Hefner is being wronged, and it is egregious.
- Thread starter JuggerNaught
- Start date
Can you yell hijack on a passenger jet without consequence? Free Speech is not saying whatever you want to.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Where does Nambla fit in there?
No, free speech has caveats to it. You can do anything that would cause harm
Aaaaaand now we're back to Nambla and nekid women not being the same thing.
Nambla is not a religon, so i dont know how you think it is connected to free speech, but its not.
My point, that clearly went over your head, is that nambla and nudity of consenting adults is not the same thing.
this isnt the best example, see brandenburg v ohio.
also since its on topic, one of the issues with regulating ai/deepfake porn is the first amendment and prior ruling on porn lookalikes or illustrations
Never said it was, but because you struggle with critical thinking, i will elaborate more.
1. Nambla is protected by the 1st Amendment according to our current judicial system. I strongly disagree, but i do not possess any law degrees. Amadouche probably pleased about this.
2. Nambla though considered indecent to 99.99% of any rational person, hides behind this inept judicial system.
3. Pornography, like Pedophilia (not saying the same) is considered indecent by many, but not near to the level of peds, so it is an ethic vs right thing I guess. Personally i support pornography for adults, hell im ok with prostitution and gambling being legal for adults.
4. However, if a community has enough votes, should they not be allowed to prohibit something? What defines an inalienable right in todays society? Is it Juggs or Jimmy Pop? What? that is the crux of this debate.
I personally do not feel access to porn is an inalienable right. Not all rights granted by our government are, and that's ok.
It is. They can say whatever they like, as long as they dont take action upon it
Its only inept to you because you don't agree with it in this instance.
Pornography/art
tomato, tomato
thats the awesome thing about living in a republic as opposed to a democracy. we don't use mob rule to decide what is ok or not ok for everyone else.
voting is not mob rule juggs
democracy is mob rule
IIRC there is a local allowance for community standards about porn. I can't Google it right now