remember that time you weren't reeeeeeing so hard that you could form a coherent sentence?remember that time when thought a provable, definitive, well defined, 50% of variations didn't imply causation nor correlation
I do
LMAO
The data both from twin studies and DNA analysis are unambiguous: intelligence is strongly heritable. Typically around 50 per cent of variations in intelligence between individuals can be ascribed to genes, although these gene-induced differences become markedly more apparent as we age. As Ritchie says: like it or not, the debate about whether genes affect intelligence is over.
As Ritchie says: like it or not, the debate about whether genes affect intelligence is over.
Could you link 3 papers published in scientific journals that corroborate your Darwin quote and attribute the difference to genetics?
Apart from having no experience with what goes on in schools nowadays, I actually agree with this.the problem with science and math today is that it is demonstrating realities that people of SJW mindset don't like
that doesn't conform with what they feel
or want for the world around them
and much like an actual religion schools are starting to get into blasphemy regions of discussion that are actually harming society and impeding intellectual progress
very PROGRESSIVE i know
I never disputed that genes affect intelligence. Who are you having this argument with?
Could you link 3 papers published in scientific journals that corroborate your Darwin quote and attribute the difference to genetics?
Pro tip: the Darwin quote you posted doesn't just say that genes have an effect on intelligence. It also says that the differences are according to race.scientific process and peer review doesn't involve NUH UH neighing
Darwin was wrong about "SOME STUFF"
this is some lazy shit MLP
F-
fyi
tbch
this is nearly word-for-word the last post i made at tribalwar gaming news b4 absent's holocaust denial broke me so hard that i can't find the shift key nemore, let alone write a complete sentence
Pro tip: the Darwin quote you posted doesn't just say that genes have an effect on intelligence. It also says that the differences are according to race.
What I asked you to do is cite some papers that show that people of different races have different inelligence because of their race?
Pro tip: the Darwin quote you posted doesn't just say that genes have an effect on intelligence. It also says that the differences are according to race.
What I asked you to do is cite some papers that show that people of different races have different inelligence because of their race?
Except the guy doesn't have a leg to stand on with the quote you posted. Because while it may have been observed that there are differences in intelligence among the races in US populations, the cause of the difference has never been attributed to genes. And since genes only account for 50% of variations, AND there are also pretty heavy socioeconomic factors that serve as a plausible explanation, he's in no position to conclude that blacks are inherently dumber because they're black.nope then we are on the same page
in the same book even
that is all my point was
the idea that this topic is blasphemy is in fact my entire objection
they legit taking away that guys credentials for stating what I appear to be factual.......or at least provable
that is backwards of a world I care to live in
if we can't find any peer reviewed sources, will some pictures from 4chan and Twitter be OK?
*reeeees intensify*