Do Liberals Really Like Charles Darwin?

if you get the same result over and over again

that could be anything

there is nothing to learn from that

or even any reason to study it further you know

that is science for leftists now who don't like the outcome or conclusion
 
it has to be something other than genetics

DxMcXpVWwAACu9t.jpg


and race.......and money......and socioeconomics

what that is you can't explain but I am all ears when you figure it out
 
i dont think ama is capable of admitting hes wrong, even the tiniest bit despite a circle of facts jerking on his face :lol:
 
Goshin said:
durrrrrrrr
do people in the future really like people in the past because they had some stupid fucking ideas based on the culture of their times?

i think all scientists hate the enlightenment cuz they were all about god
i think all artists hate the Renaissance cuz they were all about god
neither of these groups can be called godly anymore am i right
think of the mental gymnastics!

dude we should blow up the pyramids

SLAVES MADE THEM!!!!
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Click to expand...
 
HaPpY said:
i dont think ama is capable of admitting hes wrong, even the tiniest bit despite a circle of facts jerking on his face :lol:
Click to expand...

he really is a closed minded shit for brains

he just cuts off when he hears or sees something he doesn't like.....like some petulent child covering his eyes with his fingers or putting his head into a pillow when a scary scene comes on Cartoon Network at night

the children with two black parents scored lower than the children with one black and white parent, who in turn scored lower than the adopted children with two white parents
Click to expand...

He actually took the time to pick out cherries from the article I gave him and highlighted this like it helps, not hurts, his case

LMAO

I mean so desperate for anything to prop up his fantasy world bubble he thinks this doesn't help my case........while further destroying his
 
- posts article to make a point
- ignores parts of the article that disprove his point
- accuses the other of cherry picking

is that really the best you can do?
 
Amadeus said:
- posts article to make a point
- ignores parts of the article that disprove his point
- accuses the other of cherry picking

is that really the best you can do?
Click to expand...

says there is no case between genes and iq

gets killed on that hill

then says there is no case between genes and race

dies on that hill

then says there is no proof between race and iq

that there is any differences between the races at all

then posts a bunch of cherries that further disprove both those statements

let the fragging and fagging continue
 
neat thing about this is i either get you to admit you are wrong

(not going to happen)

or I prove to everyone else what an insufferable :ftard: you are for others (not just as a pedo and brony)

:boogie:

we call that good enough in Science
 
Captain Tele said:
neat thing about this is i either get you to admit you are wrong

(not going to happen)

or I prove to everyone else what an insufferable :ftard: you are for others (not just as a pedo and brony)

:boogie:

we call that good enough in Science
Click to expand...
Or you just end up showing that you don't have a shred of intellectual honesty.

Oh wait, that already happened.

:boogie:
 
I mean if you can't be honest about your mental illness and desire to fornicate with prepubescent children

I guess I shouldn't expect too much from you in regards to any other topic

:shrug:

oh well the show will go on

'The brony beatings will continue until morale improves'

we achieve double rainbows
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top