U simp for reggs fucking his sister like u simp for piss pres?
Executive Summary From House Jan. 6 Committee Report
- Thread starter Bounty
- Start date
U simp for reggs fucking his sister like u simp for piss pres?
Yes, however, he was tried in the Senate for High Crimes and Misdemeanors. These are the same crimes no? So he's exposed to double Jeopardy
No, he was tried for incitement of insurrection, and the republican-controlled senate allowed no witnesses, so he was obviously acquitted by same.
The Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause prohibits anyone from being prosecuted twice for the same crime, however, the Constitution explicitly states that impeached individuals “shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment.”
Trump floated the double jeopardy argument in a speech he gave at Mar A Largo, and it's garbage, which is why he's since shut up about it. At this point, he has no choice but to bend over, spread his cheeks, and take it like a man.
The Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause prohibits anyone from being prosecuted twice for the same crime, however, the Constitution explicitly states that impeached individuals “shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment.”
Trump floated the double jeopardy argument in a speech he gave at Mar A Largo, and it's garbage, which is why he's since shut up about it. At this point, he has no choice but to bend over, spread his cheeks, and take it like a man.
dude, what is your fetish with reggs and his sister
But it doesn't occur to you that the reason that he was tried in the first place was because of the democrat controlled house and administration. Doesn't even register in that thick skull does it.
The Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause prohibits anyone from being prosecuted twice for the same crime, however, the Constitution explicitly states that impeached individuals “shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment.”
Trump floated the double jeopardy argument in a speech he gave at Mar A Largo, and it's garbage, which is why he's since shut up about it. At this point, he has no choice but to bend over, spread his cheeks, and take it like a man.[/QUOTE]
You know what else keeps him from being impeached for inciting a riot on the 6th?
Him standing on fucking national television and telling the protestors to stand down, go home and respect the decision
Now, per usual, you have been shown that you are incorrect, so either move the goal post, deflect, or scurry off and ignore
another whole lotta nothing going on here..
Him trying to do take-backs after the fact does not erase his original crimes.
This morning, everybody has their panties in a bunch that we all paid more taxes than Trump did (none) in his last year as president, but the real stories are his ethics attorney telling a witness to lie, his aides now cooperating with the justice department, and the real possibility that this criminal is going to be sentenced to prison time.
You can fight me in TW all you want, but justice is moving slowly forward.
i guess they didnt feel a need to participate in nonsense show trials created for the sole purpose of drumming up advertising dollars at the expense of peace
SkittleBrew
Veteran XV
Yes. being innocent until proven guilty is supposed to be the gold standard. He hasn't been proven guilty, therefore he is still innocent. To most people being innocent and "not guilty" are synonymous.
Flash
Veteran XX
None of this even addresses anything I said. It is the same old pivot.
You won't find me defending what happened on Jan 6th. Again, those people belong in jail for the riot they participated in. I don't see how shitting on the floor surmounts to over turning an election and there is no sense in arguing about things that didn't happen (apprehending one of our cherished public servants).
The reason you can't find traction with the right any more than they can with the left is because you all constantly embrace double standards. You have no principles.
BLM riots vs. Jan. 6th riots
Abortion vs. Mandated vaccines
International election interference vs. Domestic election interference
and on and on
Until you judge your own side as critically as you judge the other side, you are nothing more than a political pawn for the political class. You are exactly the problem in this country.
No, the senate allowed no witnesses to be called. The impeachment was real, the trial was indeed a show. It's great that he thought it was all over.
This is how I have always felt. This is why I consider both the Clinton’s and Trump as criminals.
I’m not a court of law, so I do not care about how well they avoid punishment with money and mysterious deaths. My opinion is they are all guilty.
I’d like to know more about Hunter and Don jr at some point.
The three presidents I despise the most all happen to be draft dodgers too.
That was during when the protests were happening
There is nothing 'just' about the proceedings. It just agrees with your echo chamber created narrative
what is your take on the oj trial or casey anthony
SkittleBrew
Veteran XV
I have opinions. What's your take on the Kyle Rittenhouse trial? There are examples of people found guilty who probably shouldn't have also. What about them? Guilty... not guilty... makes zero fucking difference in the court of public opinion.
Last edited: