[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread

How to be a journalist in 2016:

1. Determine your conclusion
2. Disregard any evidence that doesn't support it
 
Kerosene31 said:
As for reasonable discussion, I'm still waiting for one person to answer my question about Trump's claim:

Were there millions of fraudulent votes for Hillary and did he actually win the popular vote?
Click to expand...
Once again, Trump wasn't the first person to say this. It was proven by comparing citizens with registered voters who voted. Surprise, surprise, the numbers didn't match.

And boy, that's hard to believe since states like California have such strict voter registration such as: "Can you prove where you live? Okay, you're a registered voter now."
 
Yea look what's happening with the recount in Detroit. The count says 300, the box says 300, the envelope says 300, but there's only 50 ballots in the envelope? But don't worry, that only happened in 610 of 1680 precincts.
 
Trump's EPA Pick Spooks Liberals and the Environmental Lobby

Liberals and the environmental left have gone into a tizzy over the selection of Oklahoma attorney general Scott Pruitt as Donald Trump's pick to head of the Environmental Protection Agency.

House minority leader Nancy Pelosi says the Pruitt nomination must be blocked "for the sake of the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the planet we will leave our children." New York AG Eric Schneiderman says Pruitt is a "dangerous and an unqualified choice." Independent socialist senator Bernie Sanders declares the Pruitt pick is not only dangerous but also "sad." The League of Conservation Voters calls Pruitt not just a global warming skeptic but "an outright climate denier."
Click to expand...
Trump's EPA Pick Spooks Liberals and the Environmental Lobby | The Weekly Standard

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
oe12jRv.jpg
 
Hmmmmmm...

U.S. stocks closed higher Wednesday with the Dow industrials and S&P 500 notching new records, shaking off early weakness in the health-care sector to extend gains.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +1.55% marked its third consecutive record close, surging 297.84, or 1.6%, to finish at 19,549.62, following a fresh intraday record. Gains in Nike Inc. NKE, +3.03% Home Depot Inc. HD, +2.89% and Visa Inc. V, +2.85% outweighed a slump in health-care shares of Johnson & Johnson Inc. JNJ, -0.86% Pfizer Inc. PFE, -1.17% and Merck & Co. MRK, -0.36%
Click to expand...
Stocks close at new records as investors shake off Trump-inspired health-care drop - MarketWatch

Is it because: Trump incoming or Owebama outgoing?
 
Trump mentioned he wanted to see lower drug prices so health-care sector freaked out.

Also:
"Federal judge halts Michigan's presidential recount - Detroit Free Press"
 
Kerosene31 said:
I assume they knew they had a horribly flawed candidate, and honestly I think Trump gave them the best shot to win.

Any strategy that involved throwing Hillary at us was an awful one. As Trump says, the stuff that came out about her should have been disqualified her as president.

The Dems can cry all they want but they made a terrible choice.
Click to expand...

IT WAS HER TURN.

^The DNC and certainly the Clinton campaign honestly believed that was the case and believed it was all they needed to get her elected. The Podesta emails proved it beyond all doubt. They've been grooming her for it for 8 fucking years. They knew she was flawed... deeply, and frequently discussed the ways that her positions on various issues could hurt the campaign at least as badly as her many, many past mistakes were hurting it.

For fuck's sake, the only reason she got as many votes as she did is because the DNC sabotaged the Sanders campaign. I mean, I really have to give them credit - that was beautifully orchestrated. Sell all the Berniebots and NerverTrumps on this "Socialist outsider" candidate nonsense and then completely flip the table on them at the convention to turn the suckers into establishment Democrats -- and it fucking worked! Hahahaha!

They steered the media so expertly they fucking CREATED Trump. His candidacy should have died off long before the primaries, but Hilldawg is so Insufferable and the left so desperate that it backfired in the most epic fashion imaginable. She didn't sweep a single demographic -- not blacks, not Hispanics, not WOMEN -- all of which were supposed to be slam dunks.

They're gonna write about this election for centuries. But the best part is that the left has proven over the last month that they're NOT finished losing. They've learned nothing from the experience and they're doubling-down on all the dumb shit that made them lose so spectacularly this year. 2018 midterms are going to be hilarious and awesome.
 
Kerosene31 said:
The bias against Trump was different. And yes, the media is biased towards the left.

Trump was an unusual case though. Everyone thought it was really hilarious he was running and actually doing well for awhile.

A reality TV star was running and saying really strange things all along and it was hilarious. Sorry, it just was. It goes beyond politics.

Plus, how did that negative coverage hurt him? Did it at all? I think CNN blasting him day after day did the exact opposite. I think it just made the people who liked what he had to say love him more.
Click to expand...
Ugh, you fucking retard.

I know you can't form a single thought for yourself, but he's not a reality TV star. He's a fucking ridiculously successful billionaire who, at one point in his entire life, hosted a show.
 
JoMo said:
The bias against Trump was very negative, no matter what he did. The negative coverage actually helped him with his 'outsider' status. If they would have covered him 'fairly', he might have actually lost.

That doesn't excuse the fact of the clear bias though from 'journalists' who aren't 'commentators'. There's a difference. In commentary, it's ok to be a douchebag, but when you're supposed to be a journalist that brings the news, clear bias is awful.
Click to expand...
If they would've covered him fairly, he would've won by a colossal landslide, far greater that any remotely recent President.

There are just too many morons out there who believe what CNN/ABC/etc. says. It's that simple.

HaPpY said:
ya mexicans are actually productive. niggers are just useless
Click to expand...
Not really. They're only good at laborious or simple tasks. If it requires any thinking, they're near bottom of the barrel.
 
Validuz said:
If they would've covered him fairly, he would've won by a colossal landslide, far greater that any remotely recent President.

There are just too many morons out there who believe what CNN/ABC/etc. says. It's that simple.

Not really. They're only good at laborious or simple tasks. If it requires any thinking, they're near bottom of the barrel.
Click to expand...

right but they still do shit, as simple as it may be... niggers just collect welfare and complain about white people.
 
Hillary pulled less of a woman vote than Barack Obama did. Hell there are 50,000,000 more registered voters now than when Obama took office, and she still only pulled John Kerry numbers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top