And you are constantly pointing to these people and their people and entities and their policies as above reproach...and now, the resource for that data that they use is 'questionable by you' Could it be that you're trying to save face for an internet argument, or just a contrarian.You've repeatedly called all of those ppl/organizations into question, but now you're using them to justify a point against a position I've never held.
Could it be because... You're a reactionary?
The weirdest thing about this whole exchange is that I never once said that vaers is not valuable, or doesn't perform a genuine function. I just said that it produces unverified data.
Some of you have agreed that vaers data is unverified, but for some reason have decided that I'm against vaers in general and are arguing against that - a point I never made.
likely because you keep referring to vaers data as unreliable and unverified. So what exactly do you consider the value in unreliable, unverified data?