[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread v2

I think he's going to win this POTUS run for sure. The only thing that can prevent it would be cheating, or the FBI/CIA going after him. He won't go down for lack of votes in primary or general.

They stole it from Bolsonaro
They're doubling down all around on cheating elections in the States
They are brazen and they have everything to lose
 
tjcsr7mqimfa1.jpg
 
Democrats :lol:

House Judiciary meeting goes off the rails amid debate over rule to say pledge of allegiance | Fox News

An organizational meeting of the House Judiciary Committee turned into a bitter debate over a proposed amendment to committee rules that would require the recitation of the pledge of allegiance at the beginning of committee meetings, allowing members to bring in constituents to lead it if they wish.

The amendment, put forth by Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., was met with a challenge and another amendment by Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., who said anyone who supported an insurrection against the United States should be barred from leading the pledge.

"I think if we adopt this amendment, then we will be truthful in representing that stating this pledge is an affirmation of your defense of democracy and the Constitution. It's hard to take that claim seriously piaf in fact an individual who in any way supported an insurrection against the government of the United States is allowed to lead the pledge," Cicilline said, asking if Gaetz would support his amendment.

Gaetz countered by saying that if Cicilline's definition of "insurrection" is someone who objected to electors, "then there would be many Democrats on the committee that wouldn't be eligible to lead the pledge," noting that the last Republican to be sworn in as president without objection to electors was President George H.W. Bush.

Cicilline insisted that this was not how he defined an insurrection, and said he would allow the committee chair to determine what constitutes supporting an insurrection.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Issa, noted that insurrection is a crime, and suggested expanding Cicilline's amendment to cover all convicted felons. Cicilline declined.

"I'm not talking about convicted felons, I'm talking about elected officials who swear an oath to the Constitution of the United States who in any way participated, supported, facilitated, encouraged the insurrection against the government of the United States," Cicilline said, adding that "that's not too hard a standard."

Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., later noted that because insurrection is a crime, no one guilty of it can serve in the House anyway. He accused Cicilline of, rather than leaving such matters to the courts, wanting to be "judge, jury, and executioner."

Cicilline then admitted that no one on the committee has been found guilty of insurrection, and noted that the amendment allows for non-members to come in to lead the pledge.

Several Republicans were dismayed that the matter was being debated at all.

"I'm almost speechless," said Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J. The former Democrat who switched parties in 2019 noted that members can take 60 to 90 seconds of their time to stand up and affirm their devotion to the country.

"Come on, this can't be real. I can't believe we're having this debate."

"How can we waste time arguing about this?" he added later on. "Why the heck can't we just stand up and say we love our country and we love our flag? And if we do this more than once a day is that okay? I think it's okay."

Rep. Deborah Ross, D-N.C., noted that there is Supreme Court precedent dealing with public schools that says officials cannot force citizens to say the pledge. Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, noted that no one would be forced to say anything under the amendment.

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, blasted Democrats for their opposition to basic principles, citing not just the pledge but a recent proposal in the House Rules Committee to condemn socialism.

"And that is the state of your Democratic Party today," Roy said.

Rep. Wesley Hunt, R-Texas, a graduate of West Point, noted that saying the pledge acknowledges those who gave their lives for the country.

"The least we can do is to pay homage to the sacrifice of those that have come before us and say, you know what? Democrat or Republican, we are in this together, that flag is the one thing that unites us, let's just take 30 seconds to put all of our differences aside and say we can agree that this country is wonderful, this country has done outstanding things, and that brave men and women were willing to die for it, and that's what sets us apart from every other country in the entire world," Hunt said.

Ranking Member Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., objected to the amendment, calling it unnecessary because members already say the pledge on the House floor. Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., countered by saying that many members, including Nadler, are typically not present on the floor for the pledge.

Cicilline's amendment was voted down. Ultimately, Gaetz's amendment calling for the pledge to be said was approved without opposition, with a vote of 39-0.
 
Last edited:
President Donald Jenius Trump came after DeSantis pretty hard just recently calling him disloyal. I do not think he is going to get the nod for vice president.

Of course not. Trump can't name a VP when DeSantis has the GOP nomination.

edit: I guess he could go rogue as a third party candidate. DeSantis will wipe the floor with him during the debates though.
 
if it happens, it's going to hand the election to Biden (I think

Independents do NOT like Biden and they only voted for him because they didn't like Trump.

Desantis can pull the independents, and a good chunk of the GOP. Hell, if the DNC decides to run Biden again...I think some dems will vote Desantis as well.

Nikki is going to announce soon. She could be a wildcard, and a potential running mate for Desantis.
 
Every plaintiff that sued Trump University for grifting won, or he offered to settle. Put another way, he either lost, or gave them money if they agreed to stop suing him.
Settled because it's not worth the cost, not because of guilt.

You dodged the last couple responses because you know you're wrong.

Current news: As the grand jury is convened for the hush money payment lies, Trump has finally admitted the affair with Stormy Daniels.

On the mega-successful Truth Social network yesterday, he said, “With respect to the ‘Stormy’ nonsense, it is VERY OLD & happened a long time ago, long past the very publicly known & accepted deadline of the Statute of Limitations.”

1. Doesn't matter if it's old or not, he's been lying about it since 2018. I'm sure most of us here are old enough to recall the Clinton blowjobs.
Where did he admit he touched her? Not that I give a shit, because she's a whore and he's a billionaire, they tend to fuck each other.

2. Statute of limitations only applies if someone has committed a crime. It's superfluous to bring it up-- unless of course, that in addition to having sex with Daniels, he committed a crime.
No, idiot, it doesn't. If I rob someone 9 years ago, it doesn't mean the robbery didn't happen. It just means you can't be charged for it, or at least convicted. Actual guilt plays no part.

3. Crying about it on social media while the grand jury is already hearing evidence isn't going to do much, unless you're irretrievably thick and attempting to apply guilt salve to your ego.
No one cares.

This is tiny stuff, and in the grand scheme, doesn't (and won't) amount to much. What it will do, however, is set legal precedent for his pattern of lying, and it's going to come up again when he is charged with the big stuff.
No it doesn't.
 
well, tbf, i wouldn't exactly call either one of those guys manly men.

rip to both of them
Yeah, I know. I'm not defending DeSantis' actual quote, just mocking the felon woman beater for his inability to read a sentence properly.
 
Back
Top