I hate cops. If there are a bigger bunch of power hungry, self-centered, asshats in the world, I would be surprised.
You can go to Africa where the militia kills you and your family because of your ethnicity.I hate cops. If there are a bigger bunch of power hungry, self-centered, asshats in the world, I would be surprised.
Or maybe you could just not do shit to piss them off and in turn act like an emo with a skinned knee?
"whoo, slow down guys."@ the second to last little mexican
the sad thing is how many people got fucked up for weed, of all things.
You can go to Africa where the militia kills you and your family because of your ethnicity.
But yeah we have it pretty bad here as well.
then don't smoke weed?
it's not rocket science
... or move to Canada, where you can walk around the street smoking weed and the most that'll happen is a stern warning from a cop, if they even bother pulling over.
who the fuck cares man
hard-assed police and SWAT teams are awesome
our countries need some badass police to keep assholes in line.
as long as you're not breaking the law you're fine. I don't plan to break any laws, do you?
if you do you're a fucking criminal and your opinion shouldn't matter anyway. criminal.
You realise that most cities use there SWAT teams to serve warrants. A warrant doesn't make you a criminal, because according to Amercian Justice, you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. So basically, when you kick in the front door of a citizen and storm his private sanctuary with an armed assualt force, you've already decided he's guilty of something. If it turns out he was a dangerous criminal, we look the other way and condone the action as acceptable and necessary...
but what happens when we are wrong? Then what? How do we undo the damage we've done... because we can't, the damage we've done often is irrevocable. So what gives us the right to routinely take such a risk on behalf of the many? At what point do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one?
You realise that most cities use there SWAT teams to serve warrants. A warrant doesn't make you a criminal, because according to Amercian Justice, you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. So basically, when you kick in the front door of a citizen and storm his private sanctuary with an armed assualt force, you've already decided he's guilty of something. If it turns out he was a dangerous criminal, we look the other way and condone the action as acceptable and necessary...
but what happens when we are wrong? Then what? How do we undo the damage we've done... because we can't, the damage we've done often is irrevocable. So what gives us the right to routinely take such a risk on behalf of the many? At what point do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one?
who is Jambalaya Pretzelstein?