And you literally said there wouldn't be another election and that Mueller can do two things at once. Your implication is quite clear, no matter how badly you try to weasel out of it.
Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument, which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda.
well the "I have absolute power to pardon myself" and "I can't be indicted" arguments kind of back that theory up
just saying
Now you're a weasel and a hypocrite lol.
Let's get to at least a charge before we talk about a trial and conviction and pardon..
We got a solid charge against Trump yet?
(trump is the one bringing up pardons)
You realize pardons require accepting your own guilt, right?
Why not?
because a man can't be his own judge under our legal system?
how could that possibly make any sense
unless you mean on some moral level, which is an incredibly stupid point to make
This brings us to the differences between legislative immunity and a pardon. They are substantial. The latter carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it. The former has no such imputation or confession. It is tantamount to the silence of the witness. It is non-committal. It is the unobtrusive act of the law giving protection against a sinister use of his testimony, not like a pardon requiring him to confess his guilt in order to avoid a conviction of it.