"Radically right" == reading the Constitution.
Fun fact: SCOTUS exists not to legislate, but to interpret constitutional law.
Maybe you ought to read a book sometime.
We are. Communism is horrid for all of us.
Maybe you ought to read a book sometime.
Remind me again, why did they call them amendments?
Dude, you are talking to people that haven't read books. The Constitution (very read ) is something that is read in little books at most MAGA rallies,
Interesting since most of those militia or whatever cannot tie their own shoes.
MasterGnr
Veteran XX
there is an incredible opportunity for you to read, educate yourself, and learn something. You just have to take off your blinders.
who am I kidding?
Two dumb niggers don't know the SCOTUS doesn't create amendments to the Constitution.
Two dumb niggers don't know the SCOTUS doesn't create amendments to the Constitution.
Amazing deduction Sherlock, despite me never saying anything remotely close to that. HURRDURR.
Two dumb niggers don't know the SCOTUS doesn't create amendments to the Constitution.
Welcome to 4 of you now.
ask one of them for a response as you will not get one from me.
Imagination?
Lmao
Middle Eastern guys cant figure out why their new wife wont get pregnant
Someone has to tell them they have to fuck the other hole, not the boy hole they're used to
Under what basis?
You realize almost every legal mind in the country agrees the original Roe v Wade decision wasn't based on anything but bullshit right?
You're a typical ignorant retarded foreigner, so I will explain it simply to you: SCOTUS interprets the Constitution (and other things, but let's not confuse you). Legislators change/create law. If the vast majority wanted something changed, you vote in those representatives [read: legislators] who will do that, then get it changed. Legislators can (and have!) amend the Constitution.
For the past several decades, SCOTUS has been legislating from the bench instead of just interpreting the law as it stands. It isn't necessarily "fixed" now, but at least they're not just using personal opinions to swing one way or the other. The Constitution is supposed to be hard to change and require a lot of support or it would be utterly pointless and laws/rights would swing wildly every single election. A teenager could understand this, yet it eludes you and your kin.
Now you're educated on the topic, retard. You're welcome.
Go fuck yourself feather nigger. You're the dumbest poster here. Even if you clicked reply, it's not like I'm getting an actual reply anyway. Toddlers are more mentally capable than you.
Last edited:
Absent has no clue as to what he's talking about. He definitely doesn't know anything about RvW.
i thot he lived in a forest not with feathers
STFU you utter twat. You haven't told me anything I didn't already know, and not once did I say or imply anything contrary to any of that.
None of which changes the fact that the constitution is 250 years old and out of date, and that it consists of "amendments", many of which urgently need to be amended, because you really should be able to do that with something called an amendment (clue's in the name). Any of these dots connecting yet, dumbass?
and just how do you think amendments are added, huh?
you think they are just added when biden and nancy say to add them?
you think they are just added if california and new york say to add them?
look it up, midget.
Last edited:
good1 mitch no one said anything otherwise. In fact that’s exactly the point, its up to legislative branch to write laws, or amend the constitution. they can go for it.
Thank you for posting to complain about another poster posting things. It radically alters my opinion of your posting habits.