I don't really care for the Gone in 60 Seconds one but the CBC and the One Shot ones are great.
Washington become the new San Jose? Well, San Jose is still the San Jose, but you know what I mean.
caps are losing for 3 main reasonsWashington's biggest problem is that they are so offensively-oriented. Back on the blue line, and in net, it would be hard to look at them as a real playoff contender. Mike Green might win the Norris (I'd vote for Chara, personally) but it won't be because of his defense.
Shutting them down isn't easy, and you have to give props to the Rangers today for being able to do it, but exposing their defense and goaltending is quite a bit more doable.
if nbc has the rights to broadcast it... then what's the debate here... do we tell the national network "no go away" ?Christ I hate TSN for showing the NBC feed for the Rags-Caps game and now showing FSN Ohio feed for the Wings-Jackets. I hope they don't show the CSN feed for the Flames-Hawks game.
For being a company that can spend millions on the hockey anthem, they sure don't want to spend money on weekend coverage of hockey games. CBC's game coverage is far better than that of TSN. Hell, Rogers Sportsnet is better than TSN.
if nbc has the rights to broadcast it... then what's the debate here... do we tell the national network "no go away" ?
rightUh, what I am saying is that TSN isn't showing their own feed. They don't have their own play-by-play team and their own graphics on the screen. They're just rebroadcasting the NBC feed which every Canadian already has.
Washington's biggest problem is that they are so offensively-oriented. Back on the blue line, and in net, it would be hard to look at them as a real playoff contender. Mike Green might win the Norris (I'd vote for Chara, personally) but it won't be because of his defense.
Shutting them down isn't easy, and you have to give props to the Rangers today for being able to do it, but exposing their defense and goaltending is quite a bit more doable.
i don't see how you can say this with a straight faceMarkov should seriously be considered as a contender for the Norris way before Green.
Markov should seriously be considered as a contender for the Norris way before Green.
There are a number of players I think should seriously be considered as contenders for the Norris before Green.
Niedermayer's 1st half hurt his chances, but his 2nd half was unbelievable. He went from 14 points in 32 games to 45 points in 50 games, and he did it while carrying Anaheim on his back most nights. His +/- will kill his chances, which I find ridiculous since it's one of the most useless stats in the game, especially for a player who plays most of his 5-on-5 time against the opposing team's top line, and he did it with a shutdown line that was horrible for most of the season.
Pronger was started strong, tapered off in the middle, and then finished strong. I don't think he stood out in a big way, but he was steady.
Markov is a good pick. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to catch nearly as many Montreal games as I wanted, but he always stands out on the ice.
Boyle started out on fire, and was probably the #1 guy until halfway through when he slowed down. The biggest issue with him is that, while he is a terrific puck-mover, he's not nearly as good defensively.
Duncan Keith... why no one is talking about this guy baffles me. In my opinion, he should be a finalist. This guy brings such a complete game to Chicago. He can move the puck, put up points, and he's so smart defensively.
Campbell is crap. Too one-dimensional.
Blake didn't start as well as Boyle, but I think he was their best overall defenseman by the end of the season. He doesn't move the puck like Boyle, but he was a very stable influence in the San Jose games I saw.
I'd take a lot of these guys over Green. Green is unbelievable offensively (primarily on the PP, to be honest), but when I think Norris I'm thinking of a guy who puts up points and who can be leaned on heavily by his team defensively. Green can absorb a lot of minutes, but not nearly the same kind of defensive minutes as some other names.
My pick for the Norris would be Chara. Lidstrom will be a finalist just because he's Lidstrom, even if this season wasn't nearly as good as some of his past ones, but I expect Green to win it. Personally, my top 3 would be Chara, and then pick and choose Lidstrom, Niedermayer, Keith, and possibly Markov. The best defenseman this season has been Chara, though.
right
because nbc has the pbp team, graphics and rights to it
what's the issue here
kovalev is just as good a playmaker as ovechkin is
take the habs glasses off