guys... GUYS... video is debunked BECAUSE!!
no one has debunked shit about that video in this thread, you lying sack of shit.
I agree that idiots like Shartlicker and Cael continue to claim it was debunked when they provide zero proof. So I went to their favorite fact-check site...snopes...to see what those crack journalists say about it.
Does a C-SPAN Video Show Joe Biden ?
In there, they frame it as debunked because they claim that the threat wasn't about firing the prosecutor because he was looking into Burisma, but that the reason was the Obama administration and everyone else wanted him gone because he wasn't cracking down on corruption enough.
But when you read that entire article, you start to see they are focusing on the reason and not the quid pro quo. For example, they quote Bloomberg's awesome reporting:
The U.S. plan to push for Shokin’s dismissal didn’t initially come from Biden, but rather filtered up from officials at the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, according to a person with direct knowledge of the situation. Embassy personnel had called for U.S. loan guarantees to Ukraine to be tied to broader anti-corruption efforts, including Shokin’s dismissal, this person said.
Biden’s threat to withhold $1 billion [in U.S. loan guarantees] if Ukraine didn’t crack down on corruption reportedly came in March [2016]. That same month, hundreds of Ukrainians demonstrated outside President Petro Poroshenko’s office demanding Shokin’s resignation, and he was dismissed.
I purposefully bolded those two points because us deplorables were repeatedly saying that Quid Pro Quo Joe threatened to withhold the loans if the guy wasn't fired, so isn't that exactly what the whistleblower and Schiff were accusing Trump of doing?
We believe that Biden had ulterior motives, and I think that will be shown when we see Durham's and Giuliani's evidence. But even IF there was no personal gain by Biden, the FACT is that Biden, at the direction of the POTUS, did EXACTLY what the dims screamed was unlawful, unethical, and unpresidential.
And I believe that were were proven right because I don't think I see quid pro quo anywhere in those articles of impeachment. I see them trying to say that he was asking for a personal favor when he said "do us a favor", but in the trial they will fix that easily. They also accuse him of withholding the $380M in aid and a white house meeting. Well, once they prove that these were no different than the withholding of those loan guarantees, then its all over.
So was the fact that Biden admitted to withholding $1B in loan guarantees if the prosecutor wasn't fired and he was doing it at the direction of Obama debunked? Nope.
Not at all
But the dummy NPCs keep saying it was because Snopes and the LSM told them so.