shrug if i make logical points about something based on comparative and objective statements and get called a whiner or pessimist about it i really couldn't care less, im only looking for a response with similar comparative/objective statements about the show/other shows
i stand by my point about breaking bad, that after watching 5 1/2 seasons of walter white winning battles with homemade improvised explosives, giant magnets from trucks, cargo train heists, with walt becoming a behind-the-wheel assassin, chemist-assassin, and cartel-leader assassin to see his family safe and to prove "he is the one who knocks," that as a result of this - it seemed stupid and unbelivable to me for walter white to suddenly become completely unable to overcome any challenge or deal with any of his problems/save his family in a 2-3 episode arc that ended the series. i think it was a mistake the BB series dealt with all of walt's insurmountable problems/challenges in the final 2-3 episodes and not across more of the final season
sure these shows are entertaining on a visceral level, premium cable's version of steak and lobster as opposed to the regular 99c tripe. but i don't simply eat my food. i want to understand where the food came from, how it was cooked, and how that process compares to all the other top places i've eaten at. just chewing, tasting, and swallowing isnt enough for me