dear lockntross, juggernaught, critter, and onnotangu

AIDS is a virus, it can not survive for very long without a host.

Spreading through the water supply is not possible.

Despite what you may think, virii are not alive, they do not "eat" as you claim.
 
JuggerNaught said:
and thats what i've said about 50 times mr. thickhead.

you cant drink after someone and get hiv

but i'll lay you a small fortune that if i (or your local terrorist) has someone that is in the midst of full blown aids, cut their throat, and pitch the body in the water supply, anyone who drinks it within the next 6-20 hours (not being generous with the time at all)....anyone who has a bad tooth, cut lip, small cut gum, canker (sp) sore, cold sore, is probably fucked.
Click to expand...
6-20 hours? you'd lose. perhaps minutes.
 
187eagle said:
The time it takes for water to get from "the water supply" to your faucet is probably hours.
Click to expand...

would you say its 6 hours? 10 hours? as the virus has been found to be alive 20 hours in post morteum exams...i'd say that should cover it and then some
 
It is NOT possible to infect a water supply with AIDS. Transmitting it in water, at best, would take extreme and bizarre (and incredibly unlikely) circumstances. Just about as unlikely as you having sex with someone and transmitting it normally
 
I see how your mindset is Aestis. You are very bad at verbally attacking people, so you take something they say, twist it around to your liking, and BEAT THE FUCKING SHIT OUT OF IT.
 
JuggerNaught said:
would you say its 6 hours? 10 hours? as the virus has been found to be alive 20 hours in post morteum exams...i'd say that should cover it and then some
Click to expand...

CORPSE != WATER
 
Mr.MaGiK said:
I see how your mindset is Aestis. You are very bad at verbally attacking people, so you take something they say, twist it around to your liking, and BEAT THE FUCKING SHIT OUT OF IT.
Click to expand...

Would you like a little astroglide with your faggotry sir
 
Aestis said:
It is NOT possible to infect a water supply with AIDS. Transmitting it in water, at best, would take extreme and bizarre (and incredibly unlikely) circumstances. Just about as unlikely as you having sex with someone and transmitting it normally
Click to expand...

can't read can ya?
 
Mr.MaGiK said:
Hey Aestis, Steven from Dell spilled his soda, might wanna go get that real quick.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHA, omg funny one dude

HAHAHAHAHA

Having a real job sucks :(

PS there are no more steven ads
 
http://www.thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SafeSex/Archive/TransmissionNon/Q8705.html
http://www.thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SafeSex/Archive/TransmissionNon/Q8660.html
http://www.hivpositive.com/f-OccExposure/OSHA/Survive.htm
http://www.hivtest.org/faqs/virus.htm#14
http://www.internethealthlibrary.com/Health-problems/HIV.htm

and of course, from the CDC:

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/transmission.htm

Scientists and medical authorities agree that HIV does not survive well in the environment, making the possibility of environmental transmission remote. HIV is found in varying concentrations or amounts in blood, semen, vaginal fluid, breast milk, saliva, and tears. (See page 3, Saliva, Tears, and Sweat.) To obtain data on the survival of HIV, laboratory studies have required the use of artificially high concentrations of laboratory-grown virus. Although these unnatural concentrations of HIV can be kept alive for days or even weeks under precisely controlled and limited laboratory conditions, CDC studies have shown that drying of even these high concentrations of HIV reduces the amount of infectious virus by 90 to 99 percent within several hours. Since the HIV concentrations used in laboratory studies are much higher than those actually found in blood or other specimens, drying of HIV-infected human blood or other body fluids reduces the theoretical risk of environmental transmission to that which has been observed--essentially zero. Incorrect interpretation of conclusions drawn from laboratory studies have unnecessarily alarmed some people.

Results from laboratory studies should not be used to assess specific personal risk of infection because (1) the amount of virus studied is not found in human specimens or elsewhere in nature, and (2) no one has been identified as infected with HIV due to contact with an environmental surface. Additionally, HIV is unable to reproduce outside its living host (unlike many bacteria or fungi, which may do so under suitable conditions), except under laboratory conditions, therefore, it does not spread or maintain infectiousness outside its host.
Click to expand...

In other words, you can't get infected with HIV from water.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top