I'm saying the only thing that is between someone responsibly having a gun and someone shooting someone else in the face with a shotgun is maturity? If so, I'm really against people having guns because people as a whole, are fucking stupid as shit.
maturity... intelligence.... morals... what exactly is it you think seperates a person who shoots other people and a person who owns a gun responsibly?
your statement is dumb... of course these are things that sperate the two.
and your arguement is counter productive. the idea is to give the inteligent, moral, mature people the right to protect themselves against the immature, stupid, immoral people who go around shooting others.
i'll give you a hint - the stupid, immoral, immature people still wind up with guns if they really want them. so whats the point in punishing the mature, inteligent, moral (and at this point, law obiding) people for trying to do the same?
edit: There are 10 year olds I'd trust with a gun being in the same room as me. I could safely sleep knowing they are up and in the same room with me. you know why? because i know they have been taught how to use the weapon, what could happen, and have been deemed mature enough to handle it. (although they're not beign given handguns at this point)
And there are 25 year olds I wouldn't trust that have a gun within a mile of me. because they're fucking retarded and think they haev a gun to pull it out during an arguement to intimidate other people, then accidently wind up shooting someone (or worse, intentionally).
Last edited: