2019-nCoV

Shut Up You Fucking Racist Liar

...Negative effectiveness means a vaccinated person is more likely to contract COVID-19, the disease the virus causes, than an unvaccinated person.

Researchers with Moderna and Kaiser Permanente, who carried out the study, also found that people who received three Moderna doses were more likely to become infected when compared to people who received just two doses....

Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against infection and COVID-19 hospitalization with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants: BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 | medRxiv
 
hahaha From the beginning you were told to take the jab to save grandma
because it would stop transmission of the covid...
Fn' loozer trolls and their forever blank memories

No it wasn't.
The big claim to fame from the beginning was that it reduced severity of illness. No claims were made about transmission.

Over time, some studies seemed to indicate that transmission was reduced, but at that same time delta took over the scene and any such benefits related to transmission were done for, but reducing severe illness was still on the table. Albeit reduced somewhat.
 
I've noticed the right has gone from "cuck" to "pedo" to "liar."
While I understand that ungrounded name-calling instead of intelligent argument is what they prefer, it does make me wonder what the next one will be.
 
No it wasn't.
The big claim to fame from the beginning was that it reduced severity of illness. No claims were made about transmission.

Over time, some studies seemed to indicate that transmission was reduced, but at that same time delta took over the scene and any such benefits related to transmission were done for, but reducing severe illness was still on the table. Albeit reduced somewhat.

I forgot a further detail:
There were never any claims of reduced transmission, but there was claims that it reduced infection. Since a person can't transmit something that were never infected with, this meant a community benefit if more people are vaccinated.
But again - at that same time delta took to the scene and reduced likelihood of infection was lost.

Thus - there were claims of reduced severity of illness, and there then was found to be a reduction in likelihood to be infected. But a reduction in transmission after infection was never claimed or indicated by studies.

Tldr - reduced transmission != reduced infection.
 
Usual semantics and nonsense.

The primary endpoint of the original trials was prevention of COVID-19. Once it became evident very early that the injection also prevented infection, the widespread marketing effort was almost entirely based on this factoid. Get jabbed so that you don't infect others, be a good citizen. That was the faulty basis on which mandates were created.

By reducing COVID-19, and reducing infection, it reduced transmission. The part they didn't tell you was the horrible safety profile, and the pathetic waning effects of the shitty product. Because that wouldn't help sales.
 
I forgot a further detail:
There were never any claims of reduced transmission, but there was claims that it reduced infection. Since a person can't transmit something that were never infected with, this meant a community benefit if more people are vaccinated.
But again - at that same time delta took to the scene and reduced likelihood of infection was lost.

Thus - there were claims of reduced severity of illness, and there then was found to be a reduction in likelihood to be infected. But a reduction in transmission after infection was never claimed or indicated by studies.

Tldr - reduced transmission != reduced infection.

Did Biden Say You Won’t Get COVID if You’re Vaccinated? | Snopes.com

:ralf:
 
There were never any claims of reduced transmission






























Nope, never any claims. In fairness though you might not have seen these as they all received strikes and had their channels removed.

Oh wait they didn't? They're all still up and spreading misinformation? Weird.
 

































Nope, never any claims. In fairness though you might not have seen these as they all received strikes and had their channels removed.

Oh wait they didn't? They're all still up and spreading misinformation? Weird.

Holy fucking owned

And yep, lozza is a liar lozer
 
I forgot a further detail:
There were never any claims of reduced transmission, but there was claims that it reduced infection. Since a person can't transmit something that were never infected with, this meant a community benefit if more people are vaccinated.
But again - at that same time delta took to the scene and reduced likelihood of infection was lost.

Thus - there were claims of reduced severity of illness, and there then was found to be a reduction in likelihood to be infected. But a reduction in transmission after infection was never claimed or indicated by studies.

Tldr - reduced transmission != reduced infection.
its a cult
 
Back
Top