This was always known from the beginning.
Ofn
* haven't been sick since 1998 cuz I take L-lysine
...Negative effectiveness means a vaccinated person is more likely to contract COVID-19, the disease the virus causes, than an unvaccinated person.
Researchers with Moderna and Kaiser Permanente, who carried out the study, also found that people who received three Moderna doses were more likely to become infected when compared to people who received just two doses....
Not everyone, as the TW stalwarts that refused the vaccination all got Covid. heh.
This was always known from the beginning.
Ofn
hahaha From the beginning you were told to take the jab to save grandma
because it would stop transmission of the covid...
Fn' loozer trolls and their forever blank memories
No it wasn't.
The big claim to fame from the beginning was that it reduced severity of illness. No claims were made about transmission.
Over time, some studies seemed to indicate that transmission was reduced, but at that same time delta took over the scene and any such benefits related to transmission were done for, but reducing severe illness was still on the table. Albeit reduced somewhat.
I forgot a further detail:
There were never any claims of reduced transmission, but there was claims that it reduced infection. Since a person can't transmit something that were never infected with, this meant a community benefit if more people are vaccinated.
But again - at that same time delta took to the scene and reduced likelihood of infection was lost.
Thus - there were claims of reduced severity of illness, and there then was found to be a reduction in likelihood to be infected. But a reduction in transmission after infection was never claimed or indicated by studies.
Tldr - reduced transmission != reduced infection.
There were never any claims of reduced transmission
Nope, never any claims. In fairness though you might not have seen these as they all received strikes and had their channels removed.
Oh wait they didn't? They're all still up and spreading misinformation? Weird.
its a cultI forgot a further detail:
There were never any claims of reduced transmission, but there was claims that it reduced infection. Since a person can't transmit something that were never infected with, this meant a community benefit if more people are vaccinated.
But again - at that same time delta took to the scene and reduced likelihood of infection was lost.
Thus - there were claims of reduced severity of illness, and there then was found to be a reduction in likelihood to be infected. But a reduction in transmission after infection was never claimed or indicated by studies.
Tldr - reduced transmission != reduced infection.