This is for you Trump voters.

samUwell said:
i am really confused here.
Click to expand...
That's because you lack basic reading comprehension skills.
samUwell said:
in the thread about the Trump staffer gently touching the arm of the reporter to move her from getting too close to Trump after repeated attempts to get her to back off, you claimed:
Click to expand...
A man without the authority or right to do so grabbed another unsuspecting person mid stride with enough force to stop their forward motion and almost throw her off balance.

He did so when the individual she was trying to ask a question was surrounded by armed security paid by the US government to protect him from credible threats.

If you wouldn't have a problem with someone grabbing you in such a manner you're a beta cuck, or whatever you term is for an individual that doesn't stand up for themselves.
samUwell said:
Yet in here, a female punches a man in the face and you are saying they should have just walked away. . .
Click to expand...
A man without the authority or right to do so touched a 15 year old girl, intentionally or otherwise, and her inappropriate reaction was to strike him instead of reporting it.

Another man without the authority or right to do so injects himself into the situations, and after recognizing his much sought after opportunity, assaults not only the 15 year old girl who was in the wrong, but at least one 19 year old bystander and an unreported individual that walked away with the two appearing to have been affected by pepper spray.

Pepper spray that he had for "protection" in a crowd of "threatening" and "violent" protesters (like screaming 15 year old girls with signs), despite the presences of armed security paid by the local government to protect everyone from credible threats.

The girl should have walked away, and reported the old touchy perv. The red cap faggot with the pepper spray shouldn't have even been there with pepper spray, much less have taken it upon himself to "protect" old touchy perv by spraying not just one, but two (or three) people in a crowd where six deputies could and did respond within seconds after his assault.
 
Both incidents have one thing in common, an overreaction to something small. The reporter was not manhandled, the girl was not molested. People are getting fed up with the mountainous drama being created by mundane circumstances. We used to teach children that if someone pokes you in the chest, you walk away. Now apparently we teach them to claim that person raped you, violently threw you to the ground and it's the worst thing that's ever happened to you and you might now have PTSD, requiring government assistance and several lawsuits to settle your nerves.
 
Another Trump winner when Jim Herman won the PGA Shell Houston today.


Herman credits Trump with aiding career

http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golf-central-blog/herman-credits-trump-aiding-career/


“Got into a nice conversation with Donald, Mr. Trump, one day,” Herman said. “He’s like, `Why are you folding shirts and giving lessons? Why aren't you on the Tour? I've played with Tour players, you're good enough.’

“I don't know, maybe something like that gives you more confidence. It's nice playing out here. I definitely enjoy it better than the golf shop.”

Herman wears the Trump logo on his shirt and carries it on his bag.

“He’s been influential in getting me to the Tour,” Herman said.
 
Fool said:
Both incidents have one thing in common, an overreaction to something small. The reporter was not manhandled, the girl was not molested. People are getting fed up with the mountainous drama being created by mundane circumstances. We used to teach children that if someone pokes you in the chest, you walk away. Now apparently we teach them to claim that person raped you, violently threw you to the ground and it's the worst thing that's ever happened to you and you might now have PTSD, requiring government assistance and several lawsuits to settle your nerves.
Click to expand...

the theme of the year
g4GDnOL.jpg
 
Fool said:
Both incidents have one thing in common, an overreaction to something small.
Click to expand...
You're right.
Fool said:
The reporter was not manhandled, the girl was not molested.
Click to expand...
The reporter was not a threat to Trump, the old touchy perv didn't need red cap faggot to protect him.
Fool said:
People are getting fed up with the mountainous drama being created by mundane circumstances. We used to teach children that if someone pokes you in the chest, you walk away.
Click to expand...
We used to teach children to let the police do their job.
Fool said:
Now apparently we teach them to claim that person raped you, violently threw you to the ground and it's the worst thing that's ever happened to you and you might now have PTSD, requiring government assistance and several lawsuits to settle your nerves.
Click to expand...
Now apparently we teach them that taking the law into your own hands is acceptable, even if the target or victims(s) of your aggression isn't breaking any. We have a Presidential candidate encouraging them to "take out" protestors and offering legal support when they assault a person they disagree with.
 
LouCypher said:
We used to teach children to let the police do their job.

Now apparently we teach them that taking the law into your own hands is acceptable, even if the target or victims(s) of your aggression isn't breaking any. We have a Presidential candidate encouraging them to "take out" protestors and offering legal support when they assault a person they disagree with.
Click to expand...


None of which would be necessary without the overreactions in the first place. You act like the first aggressive act was the pepper spray, when it was her punch. She was the aggressor. She was the overreactor. She sought out a fight to begin with. She doesn't get to claim victim.
 
Fool said:
None of which would be necessary without the overreactions in the first place. You act like the first aggressive act was the pepper spray, when it was her punch. She was the aggressor. She was the overreactor. She sought out a fight to begin with. She doesn't get to claim victim.
Click to expand...
The first aggressive act was old pervy guy thinking it's ok to put your hands on someone you're arguing with. You can call it an accident, with no real harm done. It directly instigated her response, the second aggressive act, which considering the level of contact was inappropriate.

The third and most egregious aggressive act was red cap faggot's pepper spray attack. It wasn't self defense. It wasn't acting in defense of old pervy touch man. It was exploitation of the situation to attack the protestor and her associates, and it was something that faggot went to the rally with obvious intention of doing. It's evidenced by him moving from several feet away to right next to old perv, taunting before any punch was thrown, and immediately responding with pepper spray which up to that point he had absolutely zero reason to have in hand.

I don't like anybody in this fucking video, but I hate the faggot in the red cap the most, and he's probably the doppelganger of a lot of Trump supporters in this thread (like you, havax, and Validuz).
 
LouCypher said:
The first aggressive act was old pervy guy thinking it's ok to put your hands on someone you're arguing with. You can call it an accident, with no real harm done. It directly instigated her response, the second aggressive act, which considering the level of contact was inappropriate.

The third and most egregious aggressive act was red cap faggot's pepper spray attack. It wasn't self defense. It wasn't acting in defense of old pervy touch man. It was exploitation of the situation to attack the protestor and her associates, and it was something that faggot went to the rally with obvious intention of doing. It's evidenced by him moving from several feet away to right next to old perv, taunting before any punch was thrown, and immediately responding with pepper spray which up to that point he had absolutely zero reason to have in hand.

I don't like anybody in this fucking video, but I hate the faggot in the red cap the most, and he's probably the doppelganger of a lot of Trump supporters in this thread (like you, havax, and Validuz).
Click to expand...


I'm not a Trump supporter and I have no intention of voting for him. I'm just sane enough to recognize that the first aggressive act was from a non-voter who decided to enter close quarters with people she disagrees with and address them with open hostility. Protesting can be done anywhere, and without directly interfering with other people's right to assembly. Doing so is a violent act and is an open invitation to direct response.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top