So according to you, women have higher IQ, have better spatial cognition, handle stressful situations better, and are more rational?Let me know if you need a bigger shovel there fella
Is this your position?
So according to you, women have higher IQ, have better spatial cognition, handle stressful situations better, and are more rational?Let me know if you need a bigger shovel there fella
So according to you, women have higher IQ, have better spatial cognition, handle stressful situations better, and are more rational?
Is this your position?
So your position is that they are just as smart, but not in any of the ways I just pointed out, but you stand by your first statement.No. How the fuck did you arrive at that? That's the kind of ridiculous sweeping generalisation only idiots like yourself would use.
My position is that your position that "Women are not bright" is patently utter bollocks and very easily disproven, but that the only explanation for you taking that position is from personal experience. And that those who deliberately surround themselves with dim people (female or otherwise) are obviously compensating.
So your position is that they are just as smart, but not in any of the ways I just pointed out, but you stand by your first statement.
Got it.
how smart can she be, she married a dwarf
No, I can remember what I said and why I said it, but it's true I do take on the assumption that the person I'm talking to isn't just pulling 5 words out of several posts and evaluating them completely independent of the context of the discussion that I've repeated several times and even quoted myself on. That might be a bad assumption since you are the recipient.Well when you make an entirely binary statement and then in the very next post accuse me of making a binary statement, and then you make sweeping generalisations, and then you interpret my position (incorrectly) as a sweeping generalisation, I really can't do much more. Trying to debate with someone who not only can't remember the last post they made, but actually directly contradicts it 2 minutes later, is really fucking hard work. I'm just gonna go and do something easier, like nailing blancmange to the ceiling.
Males have larger brains than females, even when corrected for body size, and brain size is positively correlated with intelligence. This leads to the expectation that males should have higher average levels of intelligence than females. Yet the consensus view is that there is no sex difference in general intelligence. An examination of the literature shows that the consensus view is wrong. Among adults, males have slightly higher verbal and reasoning abilities than females and a more pronounced superiority on spatial abilities. If the three abilities are combined to form general intelligence, the mean for males is 4 IQ points higher than the mean for females. Among children up to the age of around 14 yr the sex differences are smaller because girls mature earlier than boys. The evolutionary selection pressures responsible for greater intelligence in males are discussed.
Straight men and women cannot be strictly friends from both sides if there is any attractiveness whatsoever on either side. The second there is attractiveness, there is sexual desire, therefore you are no longer "just friends." If you are a straight male (with a working libido) and your "friend" is fucking hot, you are 100000000% thinking about fucker her probably all the time. If you aren't, you're either a fucking liar, for absolutely no reason other than to feel like you have "control" over that, or you have ZERO libido, which makes you a broken male and I feel bad for you.
If she's sexy and she invites you into her bedroom to watch her try on a few outfits to wear on the way out, you don't have to come onto her..
It is val's commitment to confidence while saying the dumbest shit that makes me like his character so much.