[OMG] Another mass shoo......ah never mind.

Brasstax said:
I think we should be able to open carry an AR in one hand and a big fat blunt in the other. Then, you'd be like high and armed. You know, you'd be a little more chill and less likely to go poppin' off.
Click to expand...

You should do less thinking. You suck at it.
 
Mitchdubai said:
Don't disagree at all, but if everyone believes everyone else is tooled up, fear and the principle of kill or be killed, or shoot first ask questions later, get a huge amount of people killed that otherwise wouldn't be. On all sides.
Click to expand...

this is actually also why so many blacks get offed by the cops, but blacks are really an anomaly when it comes to the rest of america - an outlier that constantly skews us towards shit

i think if we're in an armed insurrection, that would change the outlook a bit from say a routine traffic stop gone wrong which is why u see bodycam footage of a cop blowing one away without a second thought but then stuff like Waco or the Bundys lasts for weeks/months
 
Welp, Florida just filed a bill allowing permitless carry. When it passes, which is a virtual certainlty, the USA will be an open carry country. :O
 
Mitch, you can’t possibly understand not being raised American as we don’t understand Royal Family buzz being raised in America.

Guns is part of the American fabric as the Royal Family is part of the fabric of England, That and bad food.
 
Mr Jimmy Pop said:
Mitch, you can’t possibly understand not being raised American as we don’t understand Royal Family buzz being raised in America.

Guns is part of the American fabric as the Royal Family is part of the fabric of England, That and bad food.
Click to expand...

r9Ro5cz.jpg
 
LGBR said:
this is actually also why so many blacks get offed by the cops, but blacks are really an anomaly when it comes to the rest of america - an outlier that constantly skews us towards shit
Click to expand...

Skins are killed by cops with statistics similar to blacks. You don't hear about it because there are so few of us left, it isn't noticed.
 
Get rid of the racist left and start uplifting and encouraging these people to seek a higher path. No more racism.
 
Vanster said:
Skins are killed by cops with statistics similar to blacks. You don't hear about it because there are so few of us left, it isn't noticed.
Click to expand...

And most likely if you got past the emotions and down to facts, its probably for pretty much the same reasons. Their individual cultures push them to fuck around until they do indeed find out
 
amRam said:
Get rid of the racist left and start uplifting and encouraging these people to seek a higher path. No more racism.
Click to expand...

I actually agree with this. MLK preached getting out of oppression by climbing your way out without relying on handouts. Then he was shot and everyone then became too used to being a victim. Social programs are like invisible chains, very hard to overcome


This is my opinion
 
On Monday, January 30, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives’ (ATF) published the final Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached “Stabilizing Braces” rule for public inspection in the federal register.

As we reported earlier this month, the rule would subject essentially all firearms with attached stabilizing braces to the registration and taxation requirements of the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Since 2012, when Biden was serving as then-President Barack Obama’s vice president, ATF has recognized that stabilizing braces serve a legitimate function, and the inclusion of a stabilizing brace on a pistol or other firearm does not automatically subject that firearm to the provisions of the National Firearms Act. That’s because stabilizing braces were first designed and intended to help disabled veterans fire large format pistols.

With the finalization of this rule, the Biden Administration is reversing over a decade of agency guidance and rulings that the firearms industry and law-abiding American gun owners have relied on when designing or acquiring firearms.

NRA has repeatedly pushed back on administration attempts to classify firearms with attached braces under the NFA. When the most recent rule was proposed, NRA submitted comments, which you can find here.

Since the rule was first posted on ATF’s website on January 13, ATF has already been required to “clarify” several issues with the rule.

First, at the Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trade Show, ATF confirmed that braces that are removed from firearms do not necessarily have to be destroyed or altered in a way that prevents them from being reattached to a firearm. While the rule claims that destruction or alteration is required for owners who choose the option of simply removing the brace from their firearm, that requirement would be contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.

Under Thompson/Center, possession of a firearm and parts that can only be assembled into an NFA “firearm” constitutes possession of an NFA firearm. But, if the parts can be assembled into multiple lawful configurations, then the parts are not considered an NFA firearm (unless an unlawful configuration is actually assembled).

This should mean that a person who possesses an AR-15 pistol with a stabilizing brace and also possesses a 16-inch barreled upper receiver and/or a registered NFA lower should be able to keep the brace without destroying it or altering it. But, a person who only possesses a pistol with a stabilizing brace may have to dispose of or alter the brace to avoid creating an NFA firearm (in ATF’s view).

Second, in the final rule posted to ATF’s website, the agency appeared to claim that imported pistols with stabilizing braces would need to be destroyed or surrendered because they were unlawfully assembled in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(r), which generally prohibits the assembly of “non-sporting” rifles or shotguns without sufficient domestically manufactured parts.

Last week, ATF updated the final rule’ Frequently Asked Questions page to include the following answer to the question of whether section 922(r) applies to firearm impacted by the rule.

No. Section 922(r), in relevant part, makes it unlawful to assemble from imported parts a semiautomatic rifle that is otherwise not importable. The implementing regulations of the GCA at 27 CFR 478.39 provides that a person may not assemble a semiautomatic rifle using more than 10 of the imported parts listed in the relevant paragraphs of the regulation. As discussed in section IV.B.8.e of the final rule, the criminal violation under section 922(r) is for the “assembly” of the semiautomatic rifle; therefore, no modification of such firearm would cure the 922(r) violation because the “assembly” has already occurred. Accordingly, a person with an imported pistol that was subsequently equipped with a “stabilizing brace” will have the same options as anyone else under the final rule. Should that person choose to register the firearm, no further modification of the firearm with domestic parts is required.

While this answer seems to directly contradict the agency’s response to comments in the final rule, it is certainly positive news for owners of imported pistols with attached stabilizing braces.

The fact that ATF already needs to “clarify” aspects of the rule before it has been officially published in the federal register further underscores the arbitrary and confusing nature of the rule.

Fortunately for law-abiding gun owners, federal courts have recently proven more willing to invalidate agency actions that go beyond congressionally enacted statutes. Earlier this month, one of ATF’s most recent major rules was struck down by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The agency’s stabilizing brace rule should meet the same end for the same reasons.

NRA-ILA is already working on litigation to challenge this arbitrary and capricious attack on law-abiding gun owners by the Biden Administration.
Click to expand...

And just like that, millions of law abiding gun owners are about to become felons...and felons can't own guns at all...
 
Mr Jimmy Pop said:
I actually agree with this. MLK preached getting out of oppression by climbing your way out without relying on handouts. Then he was shot and everyone then became too used to being a victim. Social programs are like invisible chains, very hard to overcome


This is my opinion
Click to expand...

its actually quite amazing all the free shit you can get when youre out of work.

it makes returning to work a losing proposition in most cases. If you have a family, work a w2 job, make less than $50,000, its better to give up and take the handouts.

you can get a HUD house or a section 8 apartment, free food, free phone, free health insurance, etc and then just work cash paid jobs and avoid taxes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top