[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread



OBAMA EXPANDED NSA POWERS DAYS BEFORE LEAVING OFFICE, NOW THEY’RE BEING USED TO SABOTAGE TRUMP

After President Trump won the election, Obama quietly expanded the NSA’s ability to spy on innocent Americans just days before leaving office.

Seeing as how the deep state, which includes the NSA and FBI, appear to be leaking all of Trump’s private phone calls with foreign leaders and took down General Michael Flynn by spying on his calls and leaking them to their friends in The Washington Post and The New York Times, the story is being looked at in a completely new light.
Failing NY Times: N.S.A. Gets More Latitude to Share Intercepted Communications

In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.

The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.​

trump-fbi-nsa-leakers.jpg

Trump questioned whether the NSA and FBI were behind a multitude of leaks handed to the New York Times and Washington Post.
The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate “raw signals intelligence information,” on Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., signed them on Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.​
These are Obama loyalists who reports suggest may have worked to sabotage Trump by ousting Flynn in order to preserve Obama’s Iran deal.
Former Obama officials, loyalists planted series of stories to discredit Flynn, bolster Iran deal

[.....]
The effort, said to include former Obama administration adviser Ben Rhodes—the architect of a separate White House effort to create what he described as a pro-Iran echo chamber—included a small task force of Obama loyalists who deluged media outlets with stories aimed at eroding Flynn's credibility, multiple sources revealed.

The operation primarily focused on discrediting Flynn, an opponent of the Iran nuclear deal, in order to handicap the Trump administration's efforts to disclose secret details of the nuclear deal with Iran that had been long hidden by the Obama administration.

Insiders familiar with the anti-Flynn campaign told the Free Beacon that these Obama loyalists plotted in the months before Trump's inauguration to establish a set of roadblocks before Trump's national security team, which includes several prominent opponents of diplomacy with Iran. The Free Beacon first reported on this effort in January.
[.....]

From the failing NY Time article:
Previously, the N.S.A. filtered information before sharing intercepted communications with another agency, like the C.I.A. or the intelligence branches of the F.B.I. and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The N.S.A.’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.

Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the N.S.A. and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.

“This is not expanding the substantive ability of law enforcement to get access to signals intelligence,” said Robert S. Litt, the general counsel to Mr. Clapper. “It is simply widening the aperture for a larger number of analysts, who will be bound by the existing rules.”

But Patrick Toomey, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, called the move an erosion of rules intended to protect the privacy of Americans when their messages are caught by the N.S.A.’s powerful global collection methods. He noted that domestic internet data was often routed or stored abroad, where it may get vacuumed up without court oversight.

“Rather than dramatically expanding government access to so much personal data, we need much stronger rules to protect the privacy of Americans,” Mr. Toomey said. “Seventeen different government agencies shouldn’t be rooting through Americans’ emails with family members, friends and colleagues, all without ever obtaining a warrant.”​
Is this what happened to Flynn?

Is this why Trump’s calls with foreign leaders are being illegally leaked to the press in order to sabotage his presidency?

It sure as hell looks like that’s the case.
Remember, the point at which Donald Trump broke away from the pack and secured his victory during the primaries was when the Colorado GOP decided to deny Americans their right to vote and handed Ted Cruz all the state’s delegates, then tweeted: “We did it. #NeverTrump.”
colorado-gop-tweet_1460316871924_35912235_ver1.0_640_480.jpg


A very similar story is now happening with the deep state’s open sabotage. Even though Americans came out in droves to elect a populist leader promising massive change, the deep state is sabotaging his presidency to prevent him from implementing the agenda his supporters voted for.

1487117745674.png


The Colorado GOP’s act of sabotage backfired spectacularly and was the turning point which secured Trump and his supporters their victory, if this deep state sabotage is exposed just the same, this too could be the turning point which sinks the establishment and secures our populist revolution.

I like how the Times just glosses over the entire expanded spying powers of the intelligence communities that their Boy signed into law a few days before leaving office. Obama was such a horrible president to start with and his relationship with Big Brother is just icing on the cake. IMO - he is easily the 4th or 5th worst president we have ever had.

 
We pay dudes to go plant corn so they can then sell their corn for money.

We pay dudes to go drill for oil so they can then sell their oil for money.

We pay dudes to make air conditioners in Indiana so they can then sell their air conditioners for money.

We pay...

Food and Energy is comparable Art?

Which one is not like the other?
 
sure, I wasnt ever down in the gutter with you

and it's not my fault you are simple and thin skinned, that's your problem. maybe your magic shoes can help you run away from that

you can tell me "owned" too, it might calm your rage

:)

im in the gutter and im standing on your face

you cant even come float you trash kid
 
Iv'e been chewing bro, perhaps you need to do more work into analyzing information that doesn't fit your narrative? Absent was correct, of non discretionary spending the military takes OVER HALF. It's interesting to note that a poster from Finland understands your Federales budget better than you. How fucking sad is that? :ugh:

But this often happens to ideologues - they harp on the same old worn out and tired themes that they are cognitively dissonant to information at odds with their sad world view, and the small potatoes perspective this fosters.

From your own site: https://www.nationalpriorities.org/campaigns/military-spending-united-states/

https://media.nationalpriorities.org/uploads/discretionary_spending_pie%2C_2015_enacted.png

But let's assign costs incurred on behalf of the military - to the military:
Military 54%
VA - 6%
Gov't - 1.5% (if the military is about 25% of total budget then 25% of Gov't costs should be assigned to the military)
International Affairs - 2% ( I conservatively assigned just half)
Science - 3% (I'm assigning all of this to the military)
-----------------
66.5%

This compares to: Social security, unemployment and labour - 3%
Yet it's this expenditure that you are concerned with and post about endlessly - well that and ur ECO 101 "let the market place rule" bs.

Two thirds of discretionalry spending goes to the military. Two fucking thirds.

Though you've laughed at absent, perhaps the joke is on you? I wish you well in joining absent and other foreigners in understanding your Federal budget.
:lol: You're comparing discretionary spending vs total? You really think you made a valid point?

Are you fucking retarded? Do you not grasp WHY the military, especially the military, is mostly discretional?
 
Back
Top