What if there really were witches/communists/satanists/rapists? Better err on the side of caution.
fool 5 pages ago
"show me where I called her a liar"
fool now
"this is just like the Salem witch trials and McCarthyism"
Brett crying and lying kavanaugh
The big time cuck
I dont want this pussy crybaby in my court
Men need to stand strong not cry
I guess it's not 50/50 anymoremost likely story seems to be
1. assault happened, everyone agrees ford is credible, even trump
2. kav was blackout drunk (blackout means you can't remember it, not that you passed out)
3. kav thinks he's innocent because he can't remember it, which is why he also appears credible
4. kav *does* know he drank a lot in HS/college and he's lying about his drinking habits and references to drinking/sex because of the implication in 2
just a theory but probably the most realistic scenario
kav seemed to be credible in his denials of the assault but not at all credible in the drinking related questions, but ford also seemed entirely credible. so that's my running theory atm
cumsukkn lyin hores blazy n co gon keepon sukkn t0nsa chit n sl0rppinzup t0nsa peepee s0ss lykka da guuuuuud GUD lil fucchorez dem no emselfz 2 b smdh lol
Those two things are unrelated, and I did not call her a liar. Meanwhile you are literally rationalizing the dismissal of a basic principle like due process, placing the burden of proof on the accused, and prepared to condemn him regardless. AKA a moral panic.
cumsukkn lyin hores blazy n co gon keepon sukkn t0nsa chit n sl0rppinzup t0nsa peepee s0ss lykka da guuuuuud GUD lil fucchorez dem no emselfz 2 b smdh lol
I'm shocked triple is usually not an authoritarian I would have expected him to encourage the principle of due process.pagy bringing up due process is like bringing up miranda rights
im not saying they don't matter, but it doesn't actually mean anything here because neither applies to this situation.
its like if you got arrested and you were like "but I have my 19th amendment rights"