Kind of a bullshit cock-block by owners. The trade was actually good for all three teams.
eh
not sure about the rockets
it seemed out of character to dump like that all for gasol
Kind of a bullshit cock-block by owners. The trade was actually good for all three teams.
yup and thats not illegal
lol would be funny if odom and gasol end up staying with the lakers.. first day of training camp hey guys.. yeah about that trade.. well this is awkward
RealLamarOdom LAMAR ODOM
When a team trades u and it doesn't go down? Now what?
lol i hope odom doesnt kill himself tonight
Apparently foiling the dastardly lakers is more important to the 29 owners of the Hornets than actually improving the value of the Hornets to facilitate a sale of the team.Commissioner,
It would be a travesty to allow the Lakers to acquire Chris Paul in the apparent trade being discussed.
This trade should go to a vote of the 29 owners of the Hornets.
Over the next three seasons this deal would save the Lakers approximately $20 million in salaries and approximately $21 million in luxury taxes. That $21 million goes to non-taxpaying teams and to fund revenue sharing.
I cannot remember ever seeing a trade where a team got by far the best player in the trade and saved over $40 million in the process. And it doesn’t appear that they would give up any draft picks, which might allow to later make a trade for Dwight Howard. (They would also get a large trade exception that would help them improve their team and/or eventually trade for Howard.) When the Lakers got Pau Gasol (at the time considered an extremely lopsided trade) they took on tens of millions in additional salary and luxury tax and they gave up a number of prospects (one in Marc Gasol who may become a max-salary player).
I just don’t see how we can allow this trade to happen.
I know the vast majority of owners feel the same way that I do.
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?
Please advise….
Dan G.