You would think this would be slightly bigger news...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
edit: oops: reporting has an O in it...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
edit: oops: reporting has an O in it...
C-SPAN ftwkwolf said:flame away, but imho, fox is best news channel bar none
Falhawk said:why didn't they report it when these wmd's were found in 2003
kwolf said:flame away, but imho, fox is best news channel bar none
nu uh, it was for WAR PROFITEERING and NO BID CONTRACTS DUH!JDizzle4Rizzle said:THE WAR WAS FOR OIL, STOOPID!
Falhawk said:why didn't they report it when these wmd's were found in 2003
Falhawk said:why didn't they report it when these wmd's were found in 2003
Kowboy said:Maybe it's a "we are at war thing" and we don't want to have all our cards on the table? Who knows? President bush seems to be called an idiot and a brilliantly, crafty liar in the same sentance most of the time. Maybe he just knows that when history looks back on all this Iraq and war on terror stuff it will show he made the right choices?
Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.
"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."