"The 4th amendment provides no protection at the border or its "functional equivalent." By corssing any international borderline, a person has implicitly agreed to an inspection. Officers can stop someone at a checkpoint or its functional equivalent and detain and question them but cannot search without probable cause."
(US v Martinez-Fuerte)
I don't know why they don't just pull him out of his car every time. I'm sure the feds have passed a law about being forced to identify oneself by now.
i cant wait till we put jews in camps
omg
SOFT BORDER CHECKPOINT
OMGOMG totally legal and have existed for decades????
NAZIS
her only problem is not just saying "yes you are detained"
"The 4th amendment provides no protection at the border or its "functional equivalent." By corssing any international borderline, a person has implicitly agreed to an inspection. Officers can stop someone at a checkpoint or its functional equivalent and detain and question them but cannot search without probable cause."
(US v Martinez-Fuerte)
I don't know why they don't just pull him out of his car every time. I'm sure the feds have passed a law about being forced to identify oneself by now.
Do you really think it will be this obvious? What Orwell wrote about has already happened, the frog is boiled.
those were ICE officers, which is under the DHS