Wheat-Thin
Veteran X
patiently waiting for the next hellraiser idiotic post
PessimiStick said:I'm pretty sure the one in BF1942 is the Gotha Wing (229), not a Messerschmitt design.
Wheat-Thin said:god i so hope you are being sarcastic...otherwise wow you could not get ANY MORE WRONG even if you tried.. i dont even know where to begin...
1 - the ONLY base that they are operational out of is whiteman afb in Knob Knoster, mo
2 - they are housed in climate controled ABOVE ground hangers with maitanence work done at Tinker AFB in Oklahoma City, Ok
3 - its ALL black
4 - the b-2 was NOT an experimental aircraft from the 40's, they may of had "flying wings" but the b-2 was NO WAY shape or form even being considered back then.. it was not until the late 70's that they started experimenting/planning the b-2 and not until unveilved un 1988 .. with the first one, the "Spirit of Missouri"(ironic eh....) being delivered on Dec 17, 1993
HelenKeller said:btw leonardo di vinci made sketches of helicopters. he must be the father of aeronautics!!!
Silly memberSynent said:Camo on a plane is dumb. First off planes are really loud. Second if they're parked then the runway is a pretty good giveaway. Finally you're a shitty pilot to miss a bomber when you're on top of it, especially since most bombers in WWII flew in giant packs.
The plane in the game never saw combat. As far as I know it never even saw air. They just made it camo 'cause it looks cool in the game. And it's not dumb, because it's used quite often in low-flying tactical planes, and if it was ineffective, I'm sure they wouldn't do it.Synent said:Camo on a plane is dumb. First off planes are really loud. Second if they're parked then the runway is a pretty good giveaway. Finally you're a shitty pilot to miss a bomber when you're on top of it, especially since most bombers in WWII flew in giant packs.
HelenKeller said:
that's all well and good. but my point is...do you REALLY THINK that a B-2 needs to be concerned with something that is able to destroy it making visual contact from above?
PessimiStick said:I'm pretty sure the one in BF1942 is the Gotha Wing (229), not a Messerschmitt design.
HelenKeller said:
that's all well and good. but my point is...do you REALLY THINK that a B-2 needs to be concerned with something that is able to destroy it making visual contact from above?
They proved impractical at first due to their inherent instability. Modern computerized flight controls allow inherently unstable designs to become safe
CombatWombat said:The origional color of the Have Blue (F117 prototype) was a shade of dark blue, which is actually more ideal to blend in at night than pure black. They concluded that black however works better vs rader and more importantly, no one wanted to fly a damn near PURPLE TRIANGLE.
Synent said:Camo on a plane is dumb. First off planes are really loud. Second if they're parked then the runway is a pretty good giveaway. Finally you're a shitty pilot to miss a bomber when you're on top of it, especially since most bombers in WWII flew in giant packs.
Flunky said:the stealth bomber is painted black for two reasons:
1. RAM or Radar Absorbent Material is black
2. It flies primarily at night
now, I am not sure if they just made the RAM black because it suited the mission profile of stealth aircraft best, or if it's some physical property that it has, but whatever. And flying wings have been around since ww2, yes. They proved impractical at first due to their inherent instability. Modern computerized flight controls allow inherently unstable designs to become safe. Certain designs allow for incredible performance (agility, efficiency, etc. - the flying wing is one such design), but those designs were not previously controllable by humans without computer assistance.