Artemis Pockels
Veteran X
actually your first claim is wrong (not supported by logic)
bew I am going to give you credit where others blindly lack vision
I for one think that philosophical analysis was on par. Kurayami has many many insecurities that drive him to make fun of others, I feel sympathetic it was not his fault his mother was on over 5 depression medications at one time, and his father was MIA.
Has anyone noticed the disappearance of Kurayami and the decline of his daily posting ever since me and naptown uncovered past historical evidence and obtained the relative geographical location of the great Kurayami himself?
Let's play another round of over/under:
When you're away from Tribalwar, how often would you say you think about kurayami?
Over an average of 3 times a day?
wow
that was weird
Add to that:
Have you ever touched yourself while thinking of Kurayami?
I'm afraid you need to phrase that in an over/under fashion to play this game.
This is a fallacy.
1. Premises in which the truth of the conclusion is claimed or the truth of the conclusion is assumed (either directly or indirectly).
2. Claim C (the conclusion) is true.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because simply assuming that the conclusion is true (directly or indirectly) in the premises does not constitute evidence for that conclusion. Obviously, simply assuming a claim is true does not serve as evidence for that claim. This is especially clear in particularly blatant cases: "X is true. The evidence for this claim is that X is true."
I just want Kura to admit that the picture now Efamous on TW that everyone uses to make Kurachops is actually not really him. And if it really is him explain how it got into the hands of TW.