the WTC twin towers were designed to withstand a Boeing 707
all steel framed buildings have withstood fire indefinitely, except wtc 1,2,7.
the WTC twin towers were designed to withstand a Boeing 707
all steel framed buildings have withstood fire indefinitely, except wtc 1,2,7.[/QUOTE]
Well the didn't do what they were designed to do then. Is that your point?
I think it's hilarious that people actually believe that our government could pull of something like this without anyone knowing.
It's been well established for over a decade that anybody who believes a word of the ZOG explanation of 9/11 isn't very intelligent. A trained monkey can see it's a gigantic lie. The towers were all rigged with explosives and brought down in a controlled manner to justify waging war on Israel's regional enemy Iraq and to bully Iran by sandwiching it between Afghanistan and Iraq. Oil and mineral profits to gargantuan jew-owned corporations were an added bonus. Something that's hardly ever discussed however, is the poppy surge in Afghanistan which is used as a weapon against Iran and Russia.
So you would only plant explosives at the base of a structure?Fucking Christ. The 2nd tower went down from top to bottom. If they were going to use explosives they wouldn't put them at the top of the building.
I don't think i ever said that buddy.
The victors of wars write history and i'm quite sure that the number of 6million dead jews was slightly exaggerated.
So you would only plant explosives at the base of a structure?
You might want to do some reasearch on how commercial demolitions are being done.
I think it's hilarious that people actually believe that our government could pull of something like this without anyone knowing.
Have we ever commercially demolished a 1400 foot building?
So if we would demolish a 1700 feet building, you think they would only plant explosives at the bottom? Do i understand you correctly?Have we ever commercially demolished a 1400 foot building?