How is this cop not a murderer?

JuggerNaught

Contributor
Veteran XX


After the officer involved was acquitted of second-degree murder charges, officials in Arizona publicly released graphic video showing Daniel Shaver crawling on his hands and knees and begging for his life in the moments before he was shot and killed by police in January 2016.

Shaver died in one of at least 963 fatal police shootings in 2016, according to a Washington Post database. And his death was one of an increasing number of such shootings to prompt criminal charges in the years since the 2014 protests in Ferguson, Mo. following the death of Michael Brown. Yet charges remain rare, and convictions even more so.

The shooting, by Philip “Mitch” Brailsford, then an officer with the Mesa Police Department, occurred after officers responded to a call about a man allegedly pointing a rifle out of a fifth-floor window at a La Quinta Inn. Inside the room, Shaver, 26, had been doing rum shots with a woman he had met earlier that day and showing off a pellet gun he used in his job in pest control.

The graphic video, recorded by Brailsford’s body camera, shows Shaver and the woman exiting the hotel room and immediately complying with commands from multiple officers. The video was shown in court during the trial, but it was released to the public after jurors acquitted Brailsford on Thursday.

[ The Washington Post’s 2017 fatal police shooting database ]

After entering the hallway, Shaver immediately puts his hands in the air and lies down on the ground while informing the officer that no one else was in the hotel room.

“If you make a mistake, another mistake, there is a very severe possibility that you’re both going to get shot. Do you understand?” Sgt. Charles Langley yells before telling Shaver to “shut up.”

“I’m not here to be tactical and diplomatic with you. You listen. You obey,” the officer says.

For the next five minutes, officers give Shaver a series of instructions. First, an officer tells Shaver to put both of his hands on top of his head, then he instructs him to cross his left foot over his right foot.

“If you move, we’re going to consider that a threat and we are going to deal with it and you may not survive it,” Langley said.

The officer then has the woman crawl down the hallway, where she is taken into custody. Shaver remains on the ground in the hallway, his hands on his head.

Langley tells Shaver to keep his legs crossed and push himself up into a kneeling position. As Shaver pushes himself up, his legs come uncrossed, prompting the officer to scream at him.

“I’m sorry,” Shaver says, placing his hands near his waist, prompting another round of screaming.

“You do that again, we’re shooting you, do you understand?” Langley yells.

“Please do not shoot me,” Shaver begs, his hands up straight in the air.

At the officer’s command, Shaver then crawls down the hallway, sobbing. At one point, he reaches back — possibly to pull up his shorts — and Brailsford opens fire, striking Shaver five times.

[ Fatal shootings by police are up in the first six months of 2016, Post analysis finds ]

According to the police report, Brailsford was carrying an AR-15 rifle with the phrase “You’re F—ed” etched into the weapon. The police report also said the “shots were fired so rapidly that in watching the video at regular speed, one cannot count them.”

Brailsford testified in court that he believed Shaver was reaching for a gun.

“If this situation happened exactly as it did that time, I would have done the same thing,” Brailsford said during the trial. “I believed 100 percent that he was reaching for a gun.”

No gun was found on Shaver’s body. Two pellet rifles used in Shaver’s pest-control job were later found in the hotel room.

After two days of deliberation, jurors found Brailsford not guilty of second-degree murder as well as of a lesser charge of reckless manslaughter.

“The justice system miserably failed Daniel (Shaver) and his family,” said Mark Geragos, an attorney for Shaver’s widow, according to the Arizona Republic.

Attorneys for the officer had petitioned to keep the video from being released, and a judge agreed to block its release to the public until after the trial had concluded.

Brailsford’s attorney, Mike Piccarreta, told The Post in a previous interview that he thinks the body camera footage clears his client.

“It demonstrates that the officer had to make a split-second decision when [Shaver] moved his hands toward the small of his back after being advised that if he did, he’d be shot,” Piccarreta told The Post in 2016.

Piccarreta also said he wasn’t sure his client would be interested in trying to get his police job back.

Shaver’s widow and parents have filed wrongful-death lawsuits against the city of Mesa.

Kimberly Kindy contributed to this report.
 
he told him not to reach behind him

stupid drunk can't listen or focus on that

with that said ...... was he a little fast on the trigger given this guy was clearly cooperating to some degree and intoxicated?

i mean it is too much to ask for you to physically see the gun before shooting the shit out of someone

cops are that precious and rare of a commodity i am told

if this were a black guy some city would be burning right now

instead nobody, including me, gives a shit
 
Saw the video and as a person who has frequently expressed my distrust and disrespect for most of “law” enforcement, I actually view that as very unfortunate circumstances. I see why the officer may have panicked and do not see that as murder.
 
how about negligence?

how about legally punishable?

there have been dozens of cases in the past decade where kids pointed airsoft rifles at a cop and had the same thing happen

in those scenarios it took a realistic looking gun being pointed at a cop for such a response

this cop straight cut that part out of the scenario

i mean a cop with a vest, hiding behind a wall, locked on with an AR and he is afraid of a drunk on his knees getting the quick shot on him

LOL

i mean i don't know what the punishment should be, if any, but it should be the establishment of some new policy or guideline on how to better respond to this
 
Last edited:
The cops set up a situation to murder him. As I see it, they did not even attempt to properly apprehend the person. They gave conflicting orders and told him to shut up. He had no out whatsoever. He was dead no matter what he did, because these cops were out for blood, especially the shooter.
 
It was a power thing. You don't threaten someone's life repeatedly. You don't have someone crawl toward you.

The cop is a piece of shit. It was murder by a trigger happy coward with a Napoleon complex.
 
i can see that argument tbh

i mean tell the guy to turn around and lift his shirt

any idea of him being armed at that point would have been dismissed

guy didn't want to do that because otherwise the rest of his power trip wouldn't have been possible.......

the crawling and whatever the rest of that was.......etc

i am sold

this cop was clearly getting off on a fetish
 
The only proof I needed of a power trip was that he didn't stop to secure the kid he just put down. He knew he wasn't a threat to begin with. He moved right on to the hotel room for looking for someone else to intimidate and/or kill.
 
Just because the media over reacts to the same situations when it involves black victims doesn’t mean you should over correct and call foul when it is a white victim. There are better cases than this to use. When the white Hobo was killed by police in Albuquerque, that was murder.

I will buy the possibility of negligence. I do not know all the facts of this case, and really too desensitized to care anymore. So I’m not looking any further into this
 
the fact that the last 20 coons killed by cops are household names but all u can think of is this and some "white hobo" should be alarming nonetheless
 
I think there needs to be a consistent method for getting people to comply. The instructions were a bit confusing. Especially the part about crawling with hands in the air and feet crossed. Crawling means putting the hands on the ground. They tell them to put their hands in the air and then tell them to crawl.This is confusing. Especially to drunk people or people who are under stress.

I think this would have been better -

"GET ON THE GROUND! STRAIGHTEN YOUR ARMS OUT! STRAIGHTEN YOUR LEGS OUT! KEEP YOUR PALMS ON THE GROUND! DO NOT LIFT YOUR HANDS. DO NOT LIFT YOUR FEET! STAY LIKE THAT! DO NOT MOVE. LOOK AT THE GROUND. KEEP LOOKING AT THE GROUND. DO NOT TALK. DO NOT SAY ANYTHING UNTIL ASKED A QUESTION. YOU WILL ANSWER WITH A YES OR NO TO EACH QUESTION. YOUNG WOMAN - DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME? YOUNG MAN DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME? YOUNG WOMAN - ARE YOU INTOXICATED? YOUNG WOMAN - DO NOT MOVE. YOUNG MAN DO NOT MOVE (Another officer proceeds to cuff the woman by putting one or two sets of cuffs on behind the back - possible getting her to her knees while frisking) Then, rinse repeat with guy.

It's pretty sad that we can't have people that create and communicate simple instructions. To me the goal would be to get the people to just lay on the ground without moving and let the officers do all the work down there. Any time you have people - especially if drunk - trying to do anything other than lay there - there is a possibility for a loss of balance or something to go wrong.

It's hard enough for drunk people to just lay there and shut up. Even though it's unlikely, someone could have an epileptic fit or something - possibly fake one. So - LE has to be careful. It's just a bummer. If the dude was waving a weapon around out a window - that was really stupid. Even if legal - that's not smart. I am not saying people should be killed just for being stupid but it does raise the risk of having something go wrong. The highest risk moment was when they walked around the corner. I feel like once they hit the ground, this should have been a slam dunk. Sad for sure.
 
Last edited:
My point is whites have been murdered by police, I just don’t think in this case. Most of the blacks supposedly murdered were also not murdered, some were. Capt Tele I believe was making This a white black thing which to me it isn't. I pretty sick of the BLM, Antifa, or any other group of super sandy vaginas
 
I think there needs to be a consistent method for getting people to comply.

Oh they exist. The cops however did not follow any procedure. Cops are trained to detain people in a proper manner. There wasn't even an attempt here. They wanted to use their guns and so they set up a scenario to "justify" this execution to the duller folks in society who worship cops.
 
they should go back to the days where the cops beat you up instead of shooting you

rodney king ruined it for everyone
 
it would be cool to have a Montagne dude around. Go ahead - just try to shoot him.
Best%20Rainbow%20Six%20Siege%20operators%20Montagne.jpg
 
Back
Top