wtf are you talking about
wut?
huh?
ok....
wut Severed is saying, Little Jon, is that just because you don't like the source of information, where it comes from, does not mean or imply that said information is automatically wrong or incorrect
this is very important point that I shouldn't have to say.....or make
that shouldn't necessitate any type of posts or words, but for some reason epidemic type people insist that if they don't like the person saying something, the source, then they don't have to listen or it simply did not happen.
Like if Hitler told me he blew up an city, but I don't like Hitler....this doesn't mean he didn't blow it up and everything is just ok.....to carry on as usual as if nothing happened and I'm being lied to.
I personally dislike and despise CNN......think they are garbage and fake news, but if they told me not to eat tide pods, that they were poisonous, it doesn't mean that I should run out and eat a bowl of them like frosted flakes.
Does this make sense? I can make more posts on this if you or anyone else in this thread are confused about how this works. If further elaboration about corroboration of information and events is needed.
When Dangerdoggie said a more kosher source......he didn't mean that they cut the throat of this article and let the blood drain out as a rabbi blessed it. he meant here is a news source that might tickle your confirmation biases. Something you should also read to tell you that VDARE isn't the only one running with this......that it isn't fake news even if it came from a website that sponsors opinions that are not mainstream or you don't feel 100% comfortable with.
Brooklyn Man James Polite Arrested for Defacing Union Temple in Brooklyn With Anti-Semitic Graffiti
After Years in Foster Care, Intern ‘Adopted’ by City Hall Catches a Break
Ryan Saavedra on Twitter:
here......if you don't like that source maybe these will serve you better.
get you on the same page of history books with the rest of us again.
Last edited: