[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread

Mitch - this is going to blow your puny brain a little bit. But, I will try one more time.

The United States was based on a redundant design. As a matter of fact, current corporate computing environments and even the internet were based partially on its architecture.

Think of the USA as a rack in a data center. (DC)
The DC provides some core services like cabinets, cooling, electricity, networking, physical protection, etc.

At the start, there were only around a dozen customers. If you wanted to join, you had to follow some basic rules. But, you got a spot in the cabinet. You could share in the common resources. You could configure your server the way that you wanted including bringing your own constitution, set of rules and laws, etc. The DC didn't tell you how to run your system. As long as everything was peaceful and the nation was protected, you could pretty much do whatever the users of your system wanted to do. They elected their own sys admins and made it how they wanted.

That system expanded out to 50 customers with servers (states).

Here's the deal - it was designed to be flexible. It was designed to be redundant. It was designed to be distributed. It was designed for states to come and go*. To merge. We can lose some of those servers. It doesn't really affect the DC. The DC doesn't march around fiddling with the servers unless there are some very weird circumstances.

Kinda like Branzone and Rayn. Branzone provides a service, TW runs in the cabinets along with other tenants. What we do over here at TW has an affect on the other inhabitants but it is largely abstracted.

That is how the USA was designed. Do you wonder why the internet is designed in a similar manner? Do you see the similarities of technology and communications to the design of our country? Can you please get a fucking clue about the role of the president?

Thank you.

now stfu mitch - you ball-sucking belligerent barnacle



*Since this confused some - not on a daily basis. Not on a monthly basis. But over long periods of time. It was a framework designed for eternity and to spread out.
 
Last edited:
I didn't see much coverage here in the US on this. Pretty surgical.

Ninja Bomb, U.S Airstike kills al-Qaeda Terrorists - WATCH | iHarare News

us-hellfire-missile-strike-in-syria.jpg

ninjabomb-via-Wall-Street-Journal.png


A secretive U.S. military weapon dubbed a “Ninja Bomb” has been recently used in yet another Syrian targeted killing last Sunday subsequently assassinating al-Qaeda-affiliated Horas al-Din’s two senior commanders’ Qassam al-Urduni and Bilal al-Sanani.

Known as the AGM-114R9X Hellfire, the kinetic warhead was designed to use blades instead of explosives when hitting its target.

It is designed to plunge into 100 pounds of metal on target through tops of cars and buildings while shredding them into pieces with its six giant long ninja knives that are stowed inside and then deploy through the skin of the missile seconds before impact to ensure that it shreds anything in its tracks.

The Central Intelligence Agency and the Pentagon have used this weapon before while closely guarding its existence.

It has been deployed only on special circumstances when killing terrorist leaders with no explosion, drastically reducing damage and minimizing the chances of civilian casualties, Wall Street Journal reports.

#Syria: this afternoon US killed with a drone strike the overall military commander of Horas Al-Din, Qassam Al-Urduni, and a commander in #Idlib. pic.twitter.com/lyCveZ9szt

— QalaatM (@QalaatM) June 14, 2020

The aftermath was the assassination of Qassam al-Urduni and Bilal al-Sanani while they were on their Hyundai Santa Fe on Idlib’s city centre, Syria.

And as such, the ninja bomb left no exploded material behind, THIS TIME, only those targeted were eliminated.

#Syria: the military commander of Horas Al-Din was killed today by a US drone, firing the Hellfire “AGM-114R9X” missile already used in the past. Nicknamed “Ninja missile” it has a kinetic warhead with blades (with tremendous effect on ppl inside the car) & doesn’t use explosives pic.twitter.com/LDQkxbfMgU

— QalaatM (@QalaatM) June 14, 2020


The two generals were reportedly top wanted terrorists linked with the fierce al-Qaeda groups. However, their assassination has no serious blow to the Horas al-Din group which have gained new dominance in the northwestern Syrian region.

The U.S has been involved in a number of Syrian airstrikes that have attracted some controversy over the years.

War debris and civilian casualties – including children have been an order of the day over the past U.S airstrikes in Syria.
 
That seems like a really... potentially inhumane way to assasinate someone.

However... avoiding collateral damage probably makes up for it considering who they'd ginsu bomb.
 
That seems like a really... potentially inhumane way to assasinate someone.

However... avoiding collateral damage probably makes up for it considering who they'd ginsu bomb.
It'd be really hard not to kill someone instantly that close from the impact alone, let alone the blades as well.
 
Mitch - this is going to blow your puny brain a little bit. But, I will try one more time.

The United States was based on a redundant design. As a matter of fact, current corporate computing environments and even the internet were based partially on its architecture.

Think of the USA as a rack in a data center. (DC)
The DC provides some core services like cabinets, cooling, electricity, networking, physical protection, etc.

At the start, there were only around a dozen customers. If you wanted to join, you had to follow some basic rules. But, you got a spot in the cabinet. You could share in the common resources. You could configure your server the way that you wanted including bringing your own constitution, set of rules and laws, etc. The DC didn't tell you how to run your system. As long as everything was peaceful and the nation was protected, you could pretty much do whatever the users of your system wanted to do. They elected their own sys admins and made it how they wanted.

That system expanded out to 50 customers with servers (states).

Here's the deal - it was designed to be flexible. It was designed to be redundant. It was designed to be distributed. It was designed for states to come and go. To merge. We can lose some of those servers. It doesn't really affect the DC. The DC doesn't march around fiddling with the servers unless there are some very weird circumstances.

Kinda like Branzone and Rayn. Branzone provides a service, TW runs in the cabinets along with other tenants. What we do over here at TW has an affect on the other inhabitants but it is largely abstracted.

That is how the USA was designed. Do you wonder why the internet is designed in a similar manner? Do you see the similarities of technology and communications to the design of our country? Can you please get a fucking clue about the role of the president?

Thank you.

now stfu mitch - you ball-sucking belligerent barnacle

That makes a degree of sense but in no way explains why Trump is president or why people continue to support him. The man has spent his entire life being an abysmal human being on every conceivable level and now you have rapid cognitive decline as the gravy. He should not be given trust or responsibility for anything. At all. He doesn't know what to do next about Coronavirus, or care, and thousands more will die as a direct result of his self-obsessed failure.

Again, for the record, I don't gaf about party politics. Apart from Trump and Obama you could name any other US president and I wouldn't have a clue if they were Democrats or Republicans. Neither do I care. I'm calling Trump out for the disgusting individual he is, not which party he represents. It's sad that many others can't see it this way because of their lack of education and ability to think for themselves.
 
the idea that the us was designed for states to come and go like customers at a data center lmfao

this place is full of wacky shit
 
I thought they were our friends, the great white hope

Russia Secretly Offered Afghan Militants Bounties to Kill U.S. Troops, Intelligence Says - The New York Times

The intelligence finding was briefed to President Trump, and the White House’s National Security Council discussed the problem at an interagency meeting in late March, the officials said. Officials developed a menu of potential options — starting with making a diplomatic complaint to Moscow and a demand that it stop, along with an escalating series of sanctions and other possible responses, but the White House has yet to authorize any step, the officials said.

it's open season on american troops apparently, good luck everyone
 
Last edited:
Back
Top