No charges appropriate for Hillary Clinton email "problem"

I'm not sure if there is any level of incompetency and negligence that liberals will not try to sweep under the rug or justify in order to keep their fantasy world going at any cost

dealy went with an 80's era article on page 2

buttttttt BUSH

eggi doesn't see any crime or foul

eyes wide closed (view sig)

gothaggis saying it isn't a crime because she didn't mean to make a mistake 104 times (and delete tens of thousands of other email evidence while trying to hide her server from investigation)

hillary dindu nuffins #emaillivesmatter

u fuckin people are as demented as you are sick.....
 
Last edited:
Got Haggis? said:
if someone sent some emails..and in that email, some classified information was attached to it, but the sender didnt realize it......

then you are asked if you sent classified information and you said no (or maybe you didn't remember sending that email)..is that the same thing as lying?
Click to expand...
I honestly believe that if you have never had a security clearance at the Secret level or higher, you should not be allowed to comment on if what she did was wrong or right as you obviously don't understand the environment which those documents exist.

We have security classification guides at work that dictate what data is classified at what level for each product we make. We are required to have read the guide if we have access to the data. No excuse.

If understanding this basic rules is beyond her capabilities then she has no right to apply for the job of commander in chief.
 
Got Haggis? said:
if someone sent some emails..and in that email, some classified information was attached to it, but the sender didnt realize it......

then you are asked if you sent classified information and you said no (or maybe you didn't remember sending that email)..is that the same thing as lying?
Click to expand...

It's called criminal negligence, which is what she should be charged with.
 
State Department reopens internal probe into Hillary Clinton email scandal; administrative sanctions possible - AP

APNewsBreak: State Department reopens Clinton emails probe | The Seattle Times


WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department is reopening an internal investigation of possible mishandling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and top aides.

Spokesman John Kirby says the emails probe is restarting now that the Justice Department isn’t pursuing a criminal prosecution. The State Department suspended its review in April to avoid interfering with the FBI’s inquiry.
 
JoMo said:
State Department reopens internal probe into Hillary Clinton email scandal; administrative sanctions possible - AP

APNewsBreak: State Department reopens Clinton emails probe | The Seattle Times


WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department is reopening an internal investigation of possible mishandling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and top aides.

Spokesman John Kirby says the emails probe is restarting now that the Justice Department isn’t pursuing a criminal prosecution. The State Department suspended its review in April to avoid interfering with the FBI’s inquiry.
Click to expand...

John Kerry and his cronies on the case now

congressional medal of honor and valor for Hillary pending
 
JustinCase said:
this shit was pure gold

Click to expand...

Comey the Commie admits to her doing over two dozen felonies and doesn't bat an eye

I've only seen ideological pandering like this one other time in my life

64724661.jpg
 
i want to know why wikileaks is unlawful, or frowned upon, if you no longer need to have a security clearance to view classified material

the precedent has been set

Screen-Shot-2016-07-06-at-8.48.55-AM-e1467809401244.jpg


Edward Snowden ✔@Snowden
Break classification rules for the public's benefit, and you could be exiled.

Do it for personal benefit, and you could be President.
Click to expand...

Do it for personal benefit + get your ass out of hot water for obviously committing a crime

#POTUS2016
 
Last edited:
It bothers me a lot that the head of the FBI, on a case that has taken more than a year on one of the most powerful people in the country, can't tell me if it's two or ten people without security clearances who had unrestricted access to her email.
 
Fool said:
It bothers me a lot that the head of the FBI, on a case that has taken more than a year on one of the most powerful people in the country, can't tell me if it's two or ten people without security clearances who had unrestricted access to her email.
Click to expand...

3ca6e6c27d4bc46247e063ca3717a8af.jpg


Clinton responded on Snowden: "He broke the laws of the United States. He could have been a whistleblower. He could have gotten all the protections of being a whistleblower. He could have raised all the issues that he has raised and I think there would have been a positive response to that. In addition, he stole very important information that has unfortunately fallen into a lot of the wrong hands. So, I don't think he should be brought back home without facing the music."
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top