[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread

Fool said:
Your claims entirely paint a belief that the leftwing organizations are loaded with integrity, and all current evidence points to the opposite being true.
Click to expand...


No, "my claims" were asking why havax posts right wing centric posts to discredit MSM when Fox News should be included right along with them. You're clearly confused on my assertions so I understand why you've been arguing with me now.

They're all trash. Does that make it clearer?
 
jgrange said:
Repeating something over and over again doesn't make it true. havax did math on the wrong graph. I even tried to help him out once I felt sorry for him but he refused to accept my olive branch. Oh well.
Click to expand...

the graph said 50-60 percent of all muslims polled (50 in some countries, up to 60 in other countries) wanted sharia law for only muslims.

now, if that range across countries was 50-60 percent, what is the percentage range of muslims that want sharia law for everyone across those countries?

i'm going to let you work this out, and then you can refer back to my original post.
 
last few pages summary:

autism arsin: no idea how companies employ people but i sure do know that it isnt fair the people at the top are paid way too much

dranged: i make as many baseless accusations as cnn and got caught on it

choad: socialism isnt authoritarian. o yeah and omg, fox news is worse than cnn bcuz i said so

cael: hey boys, maga and notice me please!
 
amRam said:
Why is there so much animosity towards the rich and CEOs? You're being facetious asking ss to tell you how they're job creators, but are they not? Are people like Musk and Gates and Jobs and Cuckerberg not job creators? Does an economy need these people?
Click to expand...

the people who buy their products are the job creators (no sales = no jobs)
the people who do the hiring in their organizations are job creators

the figureheads are deadbeat shitlord faggots who ride on the backs of the real job creators while declaring themselves to be the job creators

if u drive the train up pikes peak, the train is the climber; not you. you are just manipulating the climber, the same way cuckerberg manipulates the job creators at facebook
 
The board and shareholders decide that.

Why you and arsin are jealous little fucks who feel they deserve a say in such matters is beyond me.
 
the board and the shareholders decide what?

why you support freeloaders who take while claiming they give is beyond me
 
ok, what does that have to do with the false claim that the ceo is the job creator? all the heavy lifting done in the organization, all of the real work that leads to new jobs and the work in finding people to fill those jobs, is credited to the ceo simply because the board had a vote and declared that nobody else in the organization is a contributor?
 
havax said:
the graph said 50-60 percent of all muslims polled (50 in some countries, up to 60 in other countries) wanted sharia law for only muslims.

now, if that range across countries was 50-60 percent, what is the percentage range of muslims that want sharia law for everyone across those countries?

i'm going to let you work this out, and then you can refer back to my original post.
Click to expand...


You used ambiguous phrasing back then and are now altering your statement to be clearer today.

From you - "so only around 40-50% of all muslims think everyone should be under sharia law?

and you think that's a good thing?

you're fucking stupid"


I never said this was a good or a bad thing. I actually have no idea how you even jumped to this conclusion. Religion sucks, regardless.

My response was to Jugger saying MOST Muslims support things that are dangerous to the US/West. Even if we use your 40-50% range - we know that 40% is not even close to most. Therefore, his statement was false and your statement of a good thing is dubious.

I disagree with your 42% (because the polls were missing lots of areas with Muslims like Africa) and it included Muslims who lived in countries where their religion did not influence government so they had realistic expectations of Sharia Law becoming 'Law of the Land' in the country they lived. This skewed the average of the poll.

Muslims are similar to Christians who think the Bible should influence government in 'Western' countries. I don't want either.
 
Last edited:
so autism arsin says he has a little company of his own

i say he is paid too much

both he and absent need to give ownership over to the workers and take a massive cut in pay
 
Edofnor said:
ok, what does that have to do with the false claim that the ceo is the job creator? all the heavy lifting done in the organization, all of the real work that leads to new jobs and the work in finding people to fill those jobs, is credited to the ceo simply because the board had a vote and declared that nobody else in the organization is a contributor?
Click to expand...
Do leaders do anything? Ever? Does a ship need a captain?
 
amRam said:
Do leaders do anything? Ever? Does a ship need a captain?
Click to expand...

the ceo is the king in this analogy (master of the fleet)
division presidents are the captains

does a ship need a king?

no, it doesn't. it needs a crew.

is the king's compensation proportional to his contribution in the fleet's efforts?

no, it isn't.
 
Ed, while Im pretty sure youre rattling amrams cage, just a reminder:

The king pays for the fleet and directs its endeavors.

:)
 
Edofnor said:
the ceo is the king in this analogy (master of the fleet)
division presidents are the captains

does a ship need a king?

no, it doesn't. it needs a crew.

is the king's compensation proportional to his contribution in the fleet's efforts?

no, it isn't.
Click to expand...
Jfc lmao...

CEO is the chief executive in charge of guiding the corporations. He's the guy who decides where and when resources are allocated.

Apparently in your world all a corporation needs is some accountants and an HR department. You're completely clueless.
 
Apparently, the .0005% of corporations that hire a CEO versus the CEO being the one that started the company represent the majority of corporations. The Mark Zuckerbergs, Bill Gates, Paul Allens and Steve Jobs of the world simply inherited their wealth, titles, and positions, they didn't actually create anything. They didn't start a company, hire workers, develop products and set goals/visions, they just reaped the benefits of a golden spoon.

It is known.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top