Attn: Trump Voters

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920v1.full.pdf

A total of 368 patients were evaluated (HC, n=97; HC+AZ, n=113; no HC, n=158). Rates of
death in the HC, HC+AZ, and no HC groups were 27.8%, 22.1%, 11.4%, respectively. Rates of
ventilation in the HC, HC+AZ, and no HC groups were 13.3%, 6.9%, 14.1%, respectively.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920.this version posted April 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint
3
Compared to the no HC group, the risk of death from any cause was higher in the HC group
(adjusted hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.10 to 6.17; P=0.03) but not in the HC+AZ group
(adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.56 to 2.32; P=0.72). The risk of ventilation was similar in
the HC group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.79; P=0.48) and in the HC+AZ
group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.12; P=0.09), compared to the no HC group.



hydroxycholoroquine is very effective at killing patients !
 
libscums have no sense of humor or comedic timing

this garbage thread doesn't surprise me coming from known communist sjw tic

you'll be first against the wall tic
 
cael said:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920v1.full.pdf

A total of 368 patients were evaluated (HC, n=97; HC+AZ, n=113; no HC, n=158). Rates of
death in the HC, HC+AZ, and no HC groups were 27.8%, 22.1%, 11.4%, respectively. Rates of
ventilation in the HC, HC+AZ, and no HC groups were 13.3%, 6.9%, 14.1%, respectively.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920.this version posted April 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint
3
Compared to the no HC group, the risk of death from any cause was higher in the HC group
(adjusted hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.10 to 6.17; P=0.03) but not in the HC+AZ group
(adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.56 to 2.32; P=0.72). The risk of ventilation was similar in
the HC group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.79; P=0.48) and in the HC+AZ
group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.12; P=0.09), compared to the no HC group.



hydroxycholoroquine is very effective at killing patients !
Click to expand...

Is Trump trying to kill his followers???
 
cael said:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920v1.full.pdf

A total of 368 patients were evaluated (HC, n=97; HC+AZ, n=113; no HC, n=158). Rates of
death in the HC, HC+AZ, and no HC groups were 27.8%, 22.1%, 11.4%, respectively. Rates of
ventilation in the HC, HC+AZ, and no HC groups were 13.3%, 6.9%, 14.1%, respectively.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920.this version posted April 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint
3
Compared to the no HC group, the risk of death from any cause was higher in the HC group
(adjusted hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.10 to 6.17; P=0.03) but not in the HC+AZ group
(adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.56 to 2.32; P=0.72). The risk of ventilation was similar in
the HC group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.79; P=0.48) and in the HC+AZ
group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.12; P=0.09), compared to the no HC group.

hydroxycholoroquine is very effective at killing patients !
Click to expand...
Wow. Think about all the universities that teach this stuff. You'd think they would come up with a vaccine. But no, it's in the private sector. It's almost like a math problem when you think about it. Maybe Google and their self learning AI could come up with something. It figured out Chess and Go (AlphaZera and AlphaGo).
 
Last edited:
Mr Jimmy Pop said:
Just picked up a sweet UV fleshlight.
Click to expand...

EWXt0dLXYAUVJ-w


EWXt2j4XQAAynAJ


he who raffs rast i say raffs best
 
I mean, think about it. All these Universities have these brainy professors, but they couldn't figure out Chess or Go. It was Google who did it. Granted, Google had a full staff of people who did it. That's probably the difference. Universities don't have teams of people trying to solve problems. They have teams of students trying to solve problems that are assigned by the university. But in terms of a break through, it's not going to happen unless it's by luck. An example here would be Gatoraide, which was invented in a room by UF to help football players hydrate during games. In a tour, I saw the room where this happened.
 
NoGodForMe said:
I mean, think about it. All these Universities have these brainy professors, but they couldn't figure out Chess or Go. It was Google who did it. Granted, Google had a full staff of people who did it. That's probably the difference. Universities don't have teams of people trying to solve problems. They have teams of students trying to solve problems that are assigned by the university. But in terms of a break through, it's not going to happen unless it's by luck. An example here would be Gatoraide, which was invented in a room by UF to help football players hydrate during games. In a tour, I saw the room where this happened.
Click to expand...

our best schools aren't working on cures but more disease and illness

U.S. Accuses Harvard Scientist of Concealing Chinese Funding

Bail Set At $1M For Harvard Professor Accused Of Lying About Ties To China

infection and subversion spreading their real industry goals now

that's the real money maker apparently

that and selling this country out to highest foreign bidder 100% of the time

and to think Harvard got small business loan/grant PPP money on top of their 40 Billion dollar endowment

Prosecutors say Charles M. Lieber, the chair of Harvard’s chemistry department, lied about contacts with a Chinese state-run initiative that seeks to draw foreign-educated talent.
Click to expand...

28harvardscientist-superJumbo.jpg
 
Last edited:
hehehe ohhhhhhh snopes

What's True
Professor Charles Lieber was arrested in January 2020 for misleading federal authorities about funds he allegedly received from Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) and his connections to a Chinese government-sponsored recruitment program.

What's False
Lieber's arrest had nothing to do with the novel coronavirus, nor was that virus "developed" or "manufactured" by anyone (in China or elsewhere).
Click to expand...

Was Charles Lieber Arrested for Selling the COVID-19 Coronavirus to China?

don't ever change, SNOPES

you will get an industry bailout too if Pelosi has her way

we will reward all bad actors in one $$$$$ form or another

fake news is our real deal reality
 
Last edited:
If Trump would have said "DON"T INJECT" Lysol or Clorox to cure Corona Virus

he would have cured our planets of a lot of issues right now

their TDS is so strong they would have done it just to spite and spit on him

and honestly I would have been ok with that

This is what Social Distancing in NEW YORK still looks like

Alexander Higgins on Twitter:

no saving these fucking zombies
 
the TDS is so strong we present our arguments in what if's and if's instead of actualities

parents dont let ur kids grow up austistic
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top