[9/11] Let's have a discussion.

smokingwoman.jpg
 
then obviously all the questions you pose in your post are just as stupid because those stupid movies discuss the stupid questions you seek answers to.
I'm looking for an open forum of discussion. One that isn't bound by sides. Giving me Zeitgeist to answer all of the questions only gives one side of the argument. Give anything off the mainstream media only addresses the other side of the argument.

What I'm hoping for is a cross between the two, where what you believe is challenged by something and one idea triumphs. Not, "HERE IS WHAT I BELIEVE LALALALALALALALAL CAN'T HEAR YOU".
 
The majority of TW is really dumb, Scuzzle.

They're clever and all... and some are very technically adept... but when it comes to anything jarring their padded little insulated fantasy worlds of games, porn, and escapism, all you will ever hear is "LALALLALA I CANT HEAR YOU"

Give it up.

This aint the forum for it.
 
The majority of TW is really dumb, Scuzzle.

They're clever and all... and some are very technically adept... but when it comes to anything jarring their padded little insulated fantasy worlds of games, porn, and escapism, all you will ever hear is "LALALLALA I CANT HEAR YOU"

Give it up.

This aint the forum for it.
I've been trying for years, man, no reason to quit now.
 
On a side note... you shoulda seen Brontez reaction to this post, it was so classic.

I totally curse myself almost daily for not quoting it when I had the chance, because he had an absolute fucking aneurysm over it. I can't even explain just how badly he lost his shit... Reading his post, you could actually see him spitting and sputtering and scrambling for any reason whatsoever to not even consider what I said for a nanosecond. It was like one of those rare forum moments where you saw someone completely losing their shit right there, in front of your eyes. And it was a HUGE response too... not just some one-liner freakout. It was like five paragraphs of a man's mind coming apart at the seams.

I responded to it, but like a moron I didn't hit "quote" to preserve it for eternity. In about a minute I went back to quote it, and he had deleted it and replaced it with this.

I can't even begin to tell you what a loss it was to TW history. It was classic.
 
On a side note... you shoulda seen Brontez reaction to this post, it was so classic.

I totally curse myself almost daily for not quoting it when I had the chance, because he had an absolute fucking aneurysm over it. I can't even explain just how badly he lost his shit... Reading his post, you could actually see him spitting and sputtering and scrambling for any reason whatsoever to not even consider what I said for a nanosecond. It was like one of those rare forum moments where you saw someone completely losing their shit right there, in front of your eyes. And it was a HUGE response too... not just some one-liner freakout. It was like five paragraphs of a man's mind coming apart at the seams.

I responded to it, but like a moron I didn't hit "quote" to preserve it for eternity. In about a minute I went back to quote it, and he had deleted it and replaced it with this.

I can't even begin to tell you what a loss it was to TW history. It was classic.
I don't know how I missed that, but good job.
 
Logic dictates that the jews did 911, for many reasons. More than the Mossad were involved however, I think. This took a coordinated effort on all parts. And yes, many of each category were involved here.

All one really needs to put 911 together is some critical and logical thought.

Here are just a few of motives for murdering 3000 or so unsuspecting, innocent and trusting people that day, aside from their usual hatred of us that is, just off the top of my head:

1) 911 represented the next pearl harbor that G. War Bush and his henchmen were desperately seeking. The false pretext of terrorism allowed him to invade Iraq, albeit against popular opinion. Mission Accomplished. War for engaged.

2) Lucky Larry Silverstein had bought himself a real turd from the NYPA, as he soon discovered when he became landlord of the WTC complex. It was a white elephant, hideously expensive to maintain, loaded with asbestos and three decades old. Clean up or demolition were equally expensive. Better to simply insure against acts of terrorism (triple indemnity btw). Correct me if I'm wrong but Silverstein made billions upon impact...

3) Fear mongering is only used when a tyrant wishes to sieze power. No event could have generated more fear than 911. Once a good healthy dose of fear of the ragheads was instilled, it would be easy to begin to remove rights from a terrified nation,in exchange for the promise of increased security for all. I'm sorry, I haven't been keeping up with zionist media. Is it still legal for me to say things like that, or will G. War declare me an 'unlawful enemy combatant'? How's security along that southern border these days btw?

4) Rudy Jew-lie-ani. That pretty much says it all. He was to be the self styled hero of 911, possibly the next elected prez. The media were blow-jobbing him incessantly, whilst he stood atop a mountain of rubble and looked distraught. It is more likely he actually sat in bldg 7, and presided over the event, whilst the millions in gold stored there was transported out of the sub-basements. Many sensitive and embarrassing financial and government documents and records were also stored in bldg.7. It was completely destroyed along with both towers. Reduced to powder in less than ten seconds. The records and documents are lost.

2qwip9c.gif


It's like the inverse of the holy-cost. Where there were in reality never any jews holy-costed in Germany or anywhere else and so no jews were involved, with 911 so much evidence points to so much jew involvement, that to suggest anything otherwise would be akin to actually embracing the lunacy of the Second Biggest Lie of All Time, and going on a tour through one of itz museums.

Heads will roll...

The Jews need to learn what the blacks learned a long time ago: their place in society is at the bottom.

edit: not racist or anti-semitic
 
For the record, there is video footage of Silverstein being interviewed. He says the firemen told him the fires were out of control, so he told them to pull the building, as in demolish. The interview was never aired.



Begins at 7:30.
 
Meaningless.

"Pull" is a term used by the fire department to pull out all their guys and equipment, which the NYPD did on #7 cuz it was so fucked up.

The term (and that interview) has since been skewed to be "demolish" by the conspiracy theorists, which just discredits them even more.

As usual, conspiracy theorist get the foundation right, but completely blow it when it comes to objective thinking and formulating facts.
 
Back
Top