[WARNING: POLITICAL BULLSHIT] So Kerry would offer Iran a nuclear deal...
- Thread starter Icey
- Start date
orbital 123
Veteran XX
Did you even read the article?
From this paragraph it seems as though most of the educated government which has dealt with this sort of thing for decades. I would argue the same that Bush is not the type of person who should even be a president since he is unwilling to comprimise and unwilling to discuss things with people.
The truth is, Iran would fuck itself if it gave nuclear weapons to some terrorist group, after seeing what happened in Iraq there is no way in hell they would do it. Not only that but by making a deal and setting terms that are agreed upon by Iran you gain world support and you gain a measure of control over their nuclear reactors, setting up watchdog groups and such. It is the much more diplomatic and logical not to mention the safer way to do thing.
If you take the hard stance on Iran you will have the entire middle east again you and thousands of people joining terrorist groups to hurt the US. How about you use your brain for once in your life.
From this paragraph it seems as though most of the educated government which has dealt with this sort of thing for decades. I would argue the same that Bush is not the type of person who should even be a president since he is unwilling to comprimise and unwilling to discuss things with people.
The truth is, Iran would fuck itself if it gave nuclear weapons to some terrorist group, after seeing what happened in Iraq there is no way in hell they would do it. Not only that but by making a deal and setting terms that are agreed upon by Iran you gain world support and you gain a measure of control over their nuclear reactors, setting up watchdog groups and such. It is the much more diplomatic and logical not to mention the safer way to do thing.
If you take the hard stance on Iran you will have the entire middle east again you and thousands of people joining terrorist groups to hurt the US. How about you use your brain for once in your life.
pZ II Birdy
Veteran XX
becuase the US or any european country has never tested a missle... ever.
FngrBANG said:
I asked Waiden to link me where North Korea has been threatening its neighbors with nuclear weapons.
Meso said that N.K. has been test firing missile near or over Japan.
A missile fired, a nuclear threat does not make.
The only thing N.K. has ever threatened is to test a nuclear weapon(probably underground) as part of a testing procedure that all nuclear capable countries have done including the US and most recently Pakistan and India.
N.K. has not threatened to "nuke" its neighbors. Ironically though, if I were Japan I would watch out for the US nuking them though as according to history only the US has a propensity for "nuking" people.
Blah blah blah blah *I must explain myself* blah blah blah *because my opinion is better than yours!* blah blah blah *because I understand the concept of moral relativism & whereas you are ignorant!* blah blah blah![OPs]Prophecy said:
Damn, I feel like I've accomplished something here!
pZ II Birdy
Veteran XX
FngrBANG, i haven't really enjoyed anything that you've posted since you let your thread of random facts die. What happened? (about the thread i mean)
What happened? (about the thread i mean)[OPs]Prophecy said:
When the rest of us test fires missiles, we don't do it over someone else's country like in 1998. NK test fired a missile clear across Japan and downed it in the Pacific. During the cold war, did the US test fire missiles over Canada? It is the shortest path to the USSR after all.
NightTrain
Veteran XX
N Korea threatens US with first strike[OPs]Prophecy said:
who cares if Iran gets a nuclear weapon? nuclear powers have a long history of not attacking each other. that's why EVERYONE who feels threatened by a nuclear power wants nuclear weapons.
Iran would not get nuclear weapons/weapons grade materials and then give it away or sell it; there's no good reason to do so and a million reasons not to.
countries develop and deploy nuclear weapons so other countries have to listen to them. to give away those weapons, even in a back-door attempt to blow up the infidel, is stupid and counter-productive. once they give them away, if they no longer have them. if they no longer have them they can no longer deter the enemies they intended to keep at bay. if they give away material to unreliable and dangerous people while retaining their own weapons they risk being destroyed despite the nuclear threat simply because they have proven themselves to be very dangerous people to have around.
Iran would not get nuclear weapons/weapons grade materials and then give it away or sell it; there's no good reason to do so and a million reasons not to.
countries develop and deploy nuclear weapons so other countries have to listen to them. to give away those weapons, even in a back-door attempt to blow up the infidel, is stupid and counter-productive. once they give them away, if they no longer have them. if they no longer have them they can no longer deter the enemies they intended to keep at bay. if they give away material to unreliable and dangerous people while retaining their own weapons they risk being destroyed despite the nuclear threat simply because they have proven themselves to be very dangerous people to have around.