I'm starting to think that personal attacks are a sign that you lack logical arguments..
glass houses/rocks sure, but still..
1. You have zero evidence that Trump fucked Stormy Daniels
2. You have zero evidence that Trump or the Trump campaign paid Stormy Daniels to refute #1
3. You have zero evidence that Stormy Daniels has information on Trump
4. You have zero evidence that any information from #3 would be damaging to Trump
5. You have zero evidence that #4 would be damaging enough to concern Trump
6. You have zero evidence that #5 would be damaging to such a degree that it could affect Trump's actions as President
7. You have zero evidence that if #3-#6 were true, that Stormy Daniels would have any interest in cashing in
What you're presenting triple is a speculative argument, demonstrating your pure confirmation bias. It's just another "I don't like Trump" disguised via concern trolling that a pornstar he may or may not have fucked would decide to blackmail a billionaire President that nothing damaging sticks to.