That's sounds like a weak justification for mob rule.
We pick our outrage boys!
If it's a Dem they are evil if it's gop we shout fake news!
Maga!
Or I don't think that the statement of a single individual that may or may not be true about whether someone who may or many not be a criminal should be the deciding factor on whether someone should or should not be elected. Crazy I know.
yeah, good point kotz
it's like when you're outraged about Roy Moore over suspect allegations while ignoring Bob Menendez who the DOJ claims to have corroborated evidence of banging underaged prostitutes supplied by a doctor convicted in a $100mill medicare fraud scheme
it sounds like you don't understand what due process is, and why it doesn't apply here
But I did ask whether people think he engaged in inappropriate relationships or not. That is a different question than "can they prove whether or not these relationships existed?", which seems to be the direction you want to take this
So you support that Al Franken is a predator?
I haven't followed his story is it just one person or many?
I don't really like the guy to begin with if it was one accuser I'd want more evidence or to wait same with Moore if it was multiple type deal I'd say he should step down.
I'm pretty moderate. I'm not really outraged about any of this shit because I figured it has always been going on for all sides tbh.
What the fuck are rambling about I'm not outraged about anything