The Court ruled that there is no contractual right to receive Social Security payments. Payments due under Social Security are not “property” rights and are not protected by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The interest of a beneficiary of Social Security is protected only by the Due Process Clause
Flemming v. Nestor - Wikipedia
i've been on the record that we should cancel medicare, medicaid, and social security immediately and all remaining money in these program should go straight to paying down debt
glad we're on the same page
end it now!!
The Court ruled that there is no contractual right to receive Social Security payments. Payments due under Social Security are not “property” rights and are not protected by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The interest of a beneficiary of Social Security is protected only by the Due Process Clause
Flemming v. Nestor - Wikipedia
Just more proof that socialism doesn't work. Appreciate it thanks for proving it kotz.
25 billion farm subsidies vs. 500 billion in trade deficit...I wake up every single day thinking to myself that I've just got to make more money so my taxes can support farmers hurt by our trade war with china, help your comrades or we will bash ur SS with a bike lock
You could start by saying “I was wrong, appreciate you correcting me cael and kotz.” instead of being a dick about it.
ur talking to a fucking brick
lmao
The intelligence community inspector general testified Friday to congressional investigators that the so-called “whistleblower” who mischaracterized President Donald Trump’s call with the leader of Ukraine had a previous “professional relationship” with a 2020 Democrat candidate, according to the Washington Examiner.
“The IG said [the whistleblower] worked or had some type of professional relationship with one of the Democratic candidates,” one person with knowledge of inspector general Michael Atkinson’s testimony told the Examiner’s Byron York.
[...]
[...]
Now, however, there is word of more evidence of possible bias on the whistleblower's part. Under questioning from Republicans during last Friday's impeachment inquiry interview with Atkinson, the inspector general revealed that the whistleblower's possible bias was not that he was simply a registered Democrat. It was that he had a significant tie to one of the Democratic presidential candidates currently vying to challenge President Trump in next year's election.
"The IG said [the whistleblower] worked or had some type of professional relationship with one of the Democratic candidates," said one person with knowledge of what was said.
"The IG said the whistleblower had a professional relationship with one of the 2020 candidates," said another person with knowledge of what was said.
"What [Atkinson] said was that the whistleblower self-disclosed that he was a registered Democrat and that he had a prior working relationship with a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate," said a third person with knowledge of what was said.
[...]