It's nicer looking yes, but it's obviously more of a memory hog.
Since I have 2 gigs of DDR2 ram, I fail to see how this is a problem. However, by default, windows takes about 100megs of ram total. It's not a huge deal.
I fail to see how XP screws me with my Opteron 180? You just have to install the AMD dual core drivers in order to take full advantage of the chip.
I have an intel core2 duo. However, the default ms drivers don't work very well, however, the vista ones do.
It only has recent drivers because it's a recent OS. Likewise, why the hell would you use a driver written by MS?
Tons of people do, if it works, use it. A lot of people don't go and get drivers for their cdrom, or for their IDE bridges, they use the microsoft ones.
Give it 6 months and the drivers it uses natively will be obsolete or the OS won't have the proper ones for specific kinds of hardware that are recently released. Just like every other Windows OS ever!
Not a big deal, when that time comes, then you can get them, however, all recent hardware is covered, and that is fine with me.
(not that this is a problem, because you're retarded if you're using MS native drivers anyways)
Why again? I understand Sound and video, and TV-Capture, but chipset drivers tend to work fine for the most part.
However, on my system... Opteron 180, 2GB of RAM, and a GeForce 7900GT it runs perfectly fine at no noticeable speed increases or decreases compared to XP. So basically the only advantage thus far, is having DX10 support on the OS...
So you argued with me on your opinion. I like the looks, I personally think it's more polished, and has some nicer security features than XP. I also like the permissions options, they give you quite a bit more control than XP does.