Blotter said:yeah... theres no way thats computer generated...
It saddens me that I actually have to use a post by triple, Tribalwar's biggset douchebag, to disprove something in a thread.mjoe said:i'm pretty sure everyone is suggesting that this is a PS done by some guy, not microsoft
triple said:its not a ps job, this is old news and i saw the article for it
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1989817,00.asp
Zengei said:It saddens me that I actually have to use a post by triple, Tribalwar's biggset douchebag, to disprove something in a thread.
Woah, there nelly. Look at what I was disproving and tell me exactly how your statement relates to that.Dangerdoggie said:Because Microsoft would never use a photoshoped picture just to generate hype.
This isn't an in-game screenshot, but it?s a test render of what the Flight Sim team honestly believes they can achieve in DirectX 10.
Nutcracker said:Well those "shots" are from the developers who are part of Microsoft but I still believe that the second one is fake.
Yeah sure thing, guess those reflections being the same despite the fact that the waves are completely different mean nothing to you. Ok maybe they are just applying the shader some stupid way flat over the top using the direct x 9 path, but they wouldn't need to do that at all if they were doing a proper render based on the waves and reflections.triple said:ok FSX is releasing fake screenshots despite having a beta ongoing..
think the beta testers might call bullshit, turbo?
of course its a render but its not FAKE. you just render in 3ds max what you would tell the in game engine to render using DX10 specs. That's completely different from photoshopping a lake into a picture.