Biden - Dimocrats Newest Criminal Candidate

Vanster said:
Not just yet. Our tax-codes, which are the most complicated in the world, were written by lawyers of the rich, so naturally, the rich pay little to no tax.

The poor. . Well, you can't get blood from a turnip. So who is left?
Ah yes, the working class, lower middle class, middle, and upper middle class. Hard workers, don't save a lot of reciepts, but keep going to work and paying their taxes. Wonderful, subserviant, and dependable little tax-payers they are.
Click to expand...
But dont the rich get taxed at a higher rate than anyone else?
ateSingleMarried filing jointlyMarried filing separatelyHead of household
10%$11,600 or less$23,200 or less$11,600 or less$16,550 or less
12%$11,601 to $47,150$23,201 to $94,300$11,601 to $47,150$16,551 to $63,100
22%$47,151 to $100,525$94,301 to $201,050$47,151 to $100,525$63,101 to $100,500
24%$100,526 to $191,950$201,051 to $383,900$100,526 to $191,950$100,501 to $191,950
32%$191,951 to $243,725$383,901 to $487,450$191,951 to $243,725$191,951 to $243,700
35%$243,726 to $609,350$487,451 to $731,200$243,726 to $365,600$234,701 to $609,350
37%Over $609,350Over $731,200Over $365,600Over $609,350

High-Income Taxpayers Paid the Majority of Federal Income Taxes. In 2021, the bottom half of taxpayers earned 10.4 percent of total AGI and paid 2.3 percent of all federal individual income taxes. The top 1 percent earned 26.3 percent of total AGI and paid 45.8 percent of all federal income taxes
Click to expand...


FedData_2.png
 
Vanster said:
Not just yet. Our tax-codes, which are the most complicated in the world, were written by lawyers of the rich, so naturally, the rich pay little to no tax.

The poor. . Well, you can't get blood from a turnip. So who is left?
Ah yes, the working class, lower middle class, middle, and upper middle class. Hard workers, don't save a lot of reciepts, but keep going to work and paying their taxes. Wonderful, subserviant, and dependable little tax-payers they are.
Click to expand...
And yet, you vote for the shitheels that are all about regressive taxes.
 
Couple days old but worth repeating

Biden: Folks, in a sense, I don’t know why we’re surprised by Trump, how many times does he have to prove we can’t be trusted
 
JuggerNaught said:
But dont the rich get taxed at a higher rate than anyone else?
ateSingleMarried filing jointlyMarried filing separatelyHead of household
10%$11,600 or less$23,200 or less$11,600 or less$16,550 or less
12%$11,601 to $47,150$23,201 to $94,300$11,601 to $47,150$16,551 to $63,100
22%$47,151 to $100,525$94,301 to $201,050$47,151 to $100,525$63,101 to $100,500
24%$100,526 to $191,950$201,051 to $383,900$100,526 to $191,950$100,501 to $191,950
32%$191,951 to $243,725$383,901 to $487,450$191,951 to $243,725$191,951 to $243,700
35%$243,726 to $609,350$487,451 to $731,200$243,726 to $365,600$234,701 to $609,350
37%Over $609,350Over $731,200Over $365,600Over $609,350




FedData_2.png
Click to expand...
Nobody likes the graduated income tax, but can you think of a fairer way?

Of course, on paper, the wealthiest pay the most, and at the highest rate. Because of a very complicated deduction system, written by the lawyers of the rich, for the rich, the wealthiest Americans pay little in tax, and sometimes nothing at all.

Of course this isn't everyone, and people point out repeatedly how Warren Buffet and others, pay their fair share of tax.

The general rule is, sadly, that in America, the wealthiest don't pay tax, and neither do the poor. It's you and I picking up the tab for the department of the Navy buying $200 toilet seats.
 
I say we go full communist and seize boomer wealth.

‘Eat the Boomers’: How to repay America’s national debt

You’d have to believe in Weimar economics to deny that America has a national debt problem. The total debt stands at over $34 trillion, and if you watch the clock at the Peter G. Peterson Foundation website, the amount owed is increasing by the second.


According to the foundation, each person in America would have to pay about $102,000 to pay that off. And the rate of increase is almost logarithmic. In 2006 it was about 35 percent of GDP. It now stands at 99 percent. Projections are even more worrisome. By 2054, it could be 171 percent of GDP.
Click to expand...
In his book, “A Generation of Sociopaths: How the Baby Boomers Betrayed America,” Bruce Gibney argued that “generational plunder” was their economic legacy. Through tax cuts and deficit financing of several wars, the Boomers left America in shock.
Click to expand...
 
Vanster said:
Nobody likes the graduated income tax, but can you think of a fairer way?

Of course, on paper, the wealthiest pay the most, and at the highest rate. Because of a very complicated deduction system, written by the lawyers of the rich, for the rich, the wealthiest Americans pay little in tax, and sometimes nothing at all.

Of course this isn't everyone, and people point out repeatedly how Warren Buffet and others, pay their fair share of tax.

The general rule is, sadly, that in America, the wealthiest don't pay tax, and neither do the poor. It's you and I picking up the tab for the department of the Navy buying $200 toilet seats.
Click to expand...
I think a fairer way way would be a flat tax.

How do you figure they pay little in tax, when you're looking at the graduated tax plan and they are taxed on income like everyone else
 
JuggerNaught said:
I think a fairer way way would be a flat tax.

How do you figure they pay little in tax, when you're looking at the graduated tax plan and they are taxed on income like everyone else
Click to expand...
He's talking about the uber rich. Even then it's questionable how much they really pay over a lifetime.
 
Of course Twitter's not embedding
There is no Twitter
it's X you twats
X is the name that triggers cael
pls use it

and I see the X post?
 
Do you not see his X post? I can see it. I've had no problems posting X stuff...

Anyway... back on track



It just works... :shrug:
 
Last edited:
Vanster said:
How the hell else we going to drone-strike poor brown people? I sure as fuck can't afford it. You see, with collectivism, we get so much more bang for our buck, as much as a couple hundred per whack.

Also, the terrorists hate us because we are free.
Click to expand...
u could afford it if u had a real job @ mcdonald's u slacker commie pinko
 
Vanster said:
Nobody likes the graduated income tax, but can you think of a fairer way?

Of course, on paper, the wealthiest pay the most, and at the highest rate. Because of a very complicated deduction system, written by the lawyers of the rich, for the rich, the wealthiest Americans pay little in tax, and sometimes nothing at all.

Of course this isn't everyone, and people point out repeatedly how Warren Buffet and others, pay their fair share of tax.

The general rule is, sadly, that in America, the wealthiest don't pay tax, and neither do the poor. It's you and I picking up the tab for the department of the Navy buying $200 toilet seats.
Click to expand...
It's like you look at the data, and completely ignore it and go back to trotting out the left talking point yet again.
 


Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required. It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—*don’t* verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically *do not* vote in such elections.That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.And, as noted by the
@I_A_Project
, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.”Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?The sanctity of your vote is at stake.Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence. To do that, it’s imperative that Congress pass the SAVE Act.If you agree, please like and share this post—and ask your members of Congress to cosponsor the SAVE Act today!https://dailysignal.com/2024/05/08/roy-lee-introduce-bill-to-require-citizenship-proof-to-vote/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top