[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread

I'm starting to think that personal attacks are a sign that you lack logical arguments..

glass houses/rocks sure, but still..

1. You have zero evidence that Trump fucked Stormy Daniels
2. You have zero evidence that Trump or the Trump campaign paid Stormy Daniels to refute #1
3. You have zero evidence that Stormy Daniels has information on Trump
4. You have zero evidence that any information from #3 would be damaging to Trump
5. You have zero evidence that #4 would be damaging enough to concern Trump
6. You have zero evidence that #5 would be damaging to such a degree that it could affect Trump's actions as President
7. You have zero evidence that if #3-#6 were true, that Stormy Daniels would have any interest in cashing in

What you're presenting triple is a speculative argument, demonstrating your pure confirmation bias. It's just another "I don't like Trump" disguised via concern trolling that a pornstar he may or may not have fucked would decide to blackmail a billionaire President that nothing damaging sticks to.
 
1. You have zero evidence that Trump fucked Stormy Daniels
2. You have zero evidence that Trump or the Trump campaign paid Stormy Daniels to refute #1
3. You have zero evidence that Stormy Daniels has information on Trump
4. You have zero evidence that any information from #3 would be damaging to Trump
5. You have zero evidence that #4 would be damaging enough to concern Trump
6. You have zero evidence that #5 would be damaging to such a degree that it could affect Trump's actions as President
7. You have zero evidence that if #3-#6 were true, that Stormy Daniels would have any interest in cashing in

What you're presenting triple is a speculative argument, demonstrating your pure confirmation bias. It's just another "I don't like Trump" disguised via concern trolling that a pornstar he may or may not have fucked would decide to blackmail a billionaire President that nothing damaging sticks to.


I wouldn't say zero evidence jfc his own lawyer said he paid it
 
I wouldn't say zero evidence jfc his own lawyer said he paid it

not to split hairs but his lawyer said he paid it from his own money

and it doesn't change the fact that triple is just making a bullshit "he could be blackmailed" argument, that nobody here thinks for a second triple is actually concerned by
 
Triple im not going to be mean to you

In all seriousness didnt you used to be a die hard republivan not even 6 years ago what caused the flip

he found true love in boston area

serveimage


serveimage


they both live off his ssdi and car accident insurance money

he knows she is hot based off of number of black sexual partners she had before him

she showed him the powers of mind virus, group think, and high soy protein powder diet
 
Last edited:
not to split hairs but his lawyer said he paid it from his own money

and it doesn't change the fact that triple is just making a bullshit "he could be blackmailed" argument, that nobody here thinks for a second triple is actually concerned by

and even still, it's not against the law to fuck a pornstar. it is against the law to try to blackmail someone for payment. so wouldn't the pornstar be the only one doing something against the law?
 
Irrelevant. triple's whole argument boils down to "Someone who may be from the President's past may have potentially damaging information on him and that might expose him to potential blackmail. Based on the hypothetical situation that may arise from the possibly existing information from the supposed personal connection, he should not be president."
 
another false flag? damn, democrats are desperate.

lol and in broward county, how convenient. good ole debbie wasserman-schultz up to her tricks again.
 
Last edited:
i was curious if you were gonna delve more into conspiracy theory false flag sandy hook autistic texan gibberish

nothing like turning another mass shooting into your own little political shit show

merr gerrrnzz
 
Back
Top