SS' champion, folks:
And yet you think the government should manage our health care.Pentagon accidentally included reporter in Puerto Rico spin talks | TheHill
the incompetence on display is unreal
A couple points. Corporations are already accumulating vast stores of cash, indicating that they've run out of worthwhile investment opportunities:
Maybe more to the point, trickle-down describes increased after-tax income to the wealthy, rather than coprorations. In theory it would lead to increased investment and a growing economy. In reality it has never borne out that way. There is already a glut of savings (see high asset prices world-wide), and it's demand that the economy is craving. Increasing after-tax income to middle and lower classes would feed that demand, as they have a higher propensity to spend increased income rather than simply add it to their investment asset base.
If there were ever a time where demand outstripped deployed investment capital, you might make a case that increased income to the wealthy would be called for. That does not at all describe today's world though.
A couple points. Corporations are already accumulating vast stores of cash, indicating that they've run out of worthwhile investment opportunities:
Maybe more to the point, trickle-down describes increased after-tax income to the wealthy, rather than coprorations. In theory it would lead to increased investment and a growing economy. In reality it has never borne out that way. There is already a glut of savings (see high asset prices world-wide), and it's demand that the economy is craving. Increasing after-tax income to middle and lower classes would feed that demand, as they have a higher propensity to spend increased income rather than simply add it to their investment asset base.
If there were ever a time where demand outstripped deployed investment capital, you might make a case that increased income to the wealthy would be called for. That does not at all describe today's world though.
A couple points. Corporations are already accumulating vast stores of cash, indicating that they've run out of worthwhile investment opportunities:
Maybe more to the point, trickle-down describes increased after-tax income to the wealthy, rather than coprorations. In theory it would lead to increased investment and a growing economy. In reality it has never borne out that way. There is already a glut of savings (see high asset prices world-wide), and it's demand that the economy is craving. Increasing after-tax income to middle and lower classes would feed that demand, as they have a higher propensity to spend increased income rather than simply add it to their investment asset base.
If there were ever a time where demand outstripped deployed investment capital, you might make a case that increased income to the wealthy would be called for. That does not at all describe today's world though.
A couple points. Corporations are already accumulating vast stores of cash, indicating that they've run out of worthwhile investment opportunities:
Maybe more to the point, trickle-down describes increased after-tax income to the wealthy, rather than coprorations. In theory it would lead to increased investment and a growing economy. In reality it has never borne out that way. There is already a glut of savings (see high asset prices world-wide), and it's demand that the economy is craving. Increasing after-tax income to middle and lower classes would feed that demand, as they have a higher propensity to spend increased income rather than simply add it to their investment asset base.
If there were ever a time where demand outstripped deployed investment capital, you might make a case that increased income to the wealthy would be called for. That does not at all describe today's world though.
Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch said Friday that the FBI has uncovered 30 pages of documents related to the controversial 2016 tarmac meeting between former President Bill Clinton and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
The newly uncovered documents will be sent to Judicial Watch by the end of November in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, a spokesman for the group told Fox News.
Judicial Watch originally filed a FOIA request in July 2016 -- which the Justice Department did not comply with -- seeking “all records of communications between any agent, employee, or representative” of the FBI for the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server use, and all records related to the June 27, 2016 meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton.
no fox news already got you hook line and sinker