Do Liberals Really Like Charles Darwin?
- Thread starter Captain Tele
- Start date
then hopefully you enjoy the other links above
or any of the ten thousand other ones on this topic readily available by even Google searching for now (*limited time offer on that one)
and since it is a provable 50% of variations, that imposes boundary conditions and hence limitations
knowing this, studying this, is why we can't make the argument that two 60 IQ people are likely (as in statistical proven likelihood) to produce children above 100 IQ with any type of regularity or consistency
hence the bell curve and its shape.......what are called standard deviations and measurable means
sorry but that is the reality of this situation and if it implies inferiority or superiority that is tough nuggets
science doesn't care about how you feel about the outcome
that is what people can't grasp yet
because he is a POS weasel with nothing but lies to contribute to any conversation
beyond blatant contradictions
maybe he can make us a song about it:
Edofnor
Veteran XX
what scientists can't grasp is that the feelings do matter because science is a human pursuit, and feelings matter to humans. to say that feelings don't matter is to say that science is an inhuman pursuit, which means that all scientists are inhuman. inhuman groups ought to be removed from society, and also punished for their antisocial, antihuman tendencies. pol pot was right about these scumbags.
Many a scientist, who lives his entire life in the confines of his advanced Marxist daycare, do become Communists and, as we all know, Communist's are not human.
and that's the rub
feelings is why they don't want to study certain topics
strong feelings is why that isn't enough
and they forbid you from not having the same feelings and refusing NOT to study it also
that the intellectual pursuit must end, must be killed, because they don't like the projected outcome
it doesn't correlate with their desired view of the world they want to live in
worse than don't show my kids "big bang theory" crybabies imo
feelings is why they don't want to study certain topics
strong feelings is why that isn't enough
and they forbid you from not having the same feelings and refusing NOT to study it also
that the intellectual pursuit must end, must be killed, because they don't like the projected outcome
it doesn't correlate with their desired view of the world they want to live in
worse than don't show my kids "big bang theory" crybabies imo
Last edited:
someone else already made the song so I don't have to
tyvm jt
i sometimes wonder if coombz could be a bigger faggot
or beta bitch
and with posts like this he never disapoints
now eat your soy and behave in my thread like a good little beta boy
These just reaffirm that intelligence has a genetic component. They don't conclude that any race is inherently smarter than another.
These aren't even scientific papers.
Again, just because you can show that there is some heritability of intelligence doesn't mean that race has anything to do with it.
do genes contribute to race
that is what you are asking Amadeus
and last I checked that is sort of obvious
unless you see two white people producing black kids
and two black people producing a white kid (not albino)
that is what you are asking Amadeus
and last I checked that is sort of obvious
unless you see two white people producing black kids
and two black people producing a white kid (not albino)
I mean if race has no saying over genes
then why is this a major topic in all hospitals and medical studies?
I mean they aren't doing it to be racist
diseases aren't racist either
then why is this a major topic in all hospitals and medical studies?
I mean they aren't doing it to be racist
diseases aren't racist either
lol spergtism explosion today
some genes contribute to race
some genes contribute to intelligence
can you show that there's a significant overlap?
yeah same overlap IQ distributions appear to be proving
.gif "Hmm :Hmm:")
like I said we don't have it all figured out
but we should be trying (not using denial and science obstruction tactics)
I mean you know that the proven outcome of the human genome project wasn't a 1 to 1 mapping that you are asking me for
I might as well say genetics doesn't cause or contribute to sickle cell anemia using this argument
be equally honest
Last edited:
IQ distributions are observations of a correlation, not demonstrations of causationyeah same overlap IQ distributions appear to be proving
like I said we don't have it all figured out
but we should be trying (not using denial and science obstruction tactics)
I mean you know that the proven outcome of the human genome project wasn't a 1 to 1 mapping that you are asking me for
and there are some pretty fucking good non-genetic candidates to explain the causation