bowl of blood
Contributor
I've never claimed it was simple. I said Solo had development issues, and it's coming off the heels of a poorly received TLJ (which would at least include some degree of sequel fatigue). You're arguing with me over this claim for some reason, without any basis for it other than some people you talk to still want to see it. Do you have any fact based reasoning or something you can point to that supports your opinion that TLJ was well received, that somehow justifies the staggering box office drop off?
Yes, as a general rule sequels make less money, but it's not guaranteed and it's certainly not rare (depending on your definition of rare of course) for first sequels to do better than the original. Typically it's genre dependent, and they usually fall into two categories: major franchises, or unexpected hits. But regardless of this, Star Wars is not your standard Movie +1 sequel format that typically results in huge drop offs.
yeah you've backed the goalposts up significantly from mocking the very existence of star fatigue.
you're also drawing a very imaginary failure for tlj out of the expectation that it "could have" been the chosen one to defeat sequel effect. the movie made a shitload of money, solo made a shitload too, even though it's severely underperforming. all the facts anyone needs are the box office numbers and historical data; this is what I'm trying to emphasize. and these facts simply aren't consistent with a worldview in which tlj was widely hated and largely destroyed the financial viability of solo or potentially star wars altogether. the backlash you want so badly to exist has no real world incarnation.
i mean shit people slammed episodes 1, 2, and 7 much harder than 8, and those ones didn't even have an entire media front sucking their cocks
nothing personal but just in general even outside movie threads you are like a case study in motivated reasoning