[AKA]PanamaJack said:
Noobs are what would make the game SURVIVE and GROW. The hardcore fanatics actually do far more to turn noobs OFF of a game than bring them in. Just look at how noobs are treated by the so called Tribe Vets in most games and forums.
Again, thank you for telling me what I already know, taking what I said completely out of context, and then attacking it. MY POINT WAS: Show me how you and your army of noobs will make a tribes game. In otherwords, YOU ARE NOT HARDCORE enough to get up off your ass and make a tribes game. Although it is true that your sheer numbers may inspire some coroporate executive to do so, NONE OF YOU WILL DO IT PERSONALLY. Prove me wrong.
Secondly PJ, you go on and on about how NOOBS are all that matter. You are kind of a jerk when you spout your crap. Why? Cus all players should matter. I would defenitely want the next tribes sequal to have tons of noobs, they are more then welcome. The more players the better, great.
However, does this mean I'm going to make the game SOOO EASY to play that all you have to do is flinch and everyone dies? No, because this isn't play balance. Would you make the game so easy that there is no skill involved? What would be the point of that? You'd just be making a chat room. THE GAMEPLAY MATTERS, Contrary to what you think.
Let's have a look at the sport of BASEBALL. Now, people that suck at this game can play it and have fun yes? I suck at baseball and I can play it and enjoy it. Does that mean that I look at professional players and say "CURSES, I can never be that good! Screw this I'm not playing!"?
I simply don't follow your logic as how having talented players in a game destroys the game and deters people from playing. If anything it gives people an idol, and aspirations to reach.
Many people play chess that suck and they have fun doing it. But there is only one Kasparov(Spelling?). Do people say, holy crap, that guy rocks at chess, I'm not playing? Do they PJ? sigh.
You have no argument for what you're saying, you simply keep repeating that I'm wrong and that it is the way you say it cus it is and that's just how it is.
Maybe you should stop and realize that your point of view is skewed and you can't see it from an outside perspective.
Are you saying that ALL games should be tailored for people that suck in general at video games and want to just play a skilless game that makes them feel e-tough?
Then why is Counterstike, THE MOST PLAYED game of all time A SKILL GAME? There is a curve, and elite players will spank you. It is not TAILORED to skilless noobs yet it has crushed every game ever made. This totally defies your logic.
Don't bother responding if you're just going to repeat yourself. Either argue facts and points or be quiet.