[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread

j8wp7zeyd3y21.jpg


:lol: leftists

trump/putin/pence 2020
 
2qn9qtjff5y21.jpg


Former FBI chief-legal-counsel James Baker testimony to the joint committee of congress on Wednesday October 3rd, 2018. Day one of his testimony.

walls closing in thank god for Trump prison reform amirite?

:lol:

trump/putin/pence 2024
 
Last edited:
anudda gr8 fukn day 2 fuk wit liberal whyte trash fukn effemcuck pussyass fukn l0s3rz upchea in chitcago n if u not fukn wit liberal progressiv democrat fukn l0s3rz 2 makkem kill dey selves u r a whyte trash fukn pussyass fuccboi yus lykkem smdh lol :jester:
 
when Crenshaw called that faggot pete Davidson to make sure he hadn't offed himself, even after Davidson made fun of him on SNL and was forced to apologize, just shows you what kind of a dude he is

he'd get my vote any day of the week

I'd vote for him just for this

10771290-0-image-a-47_1552113396572.jpg
 
Last edited:
That's just what they want you to believe.
well he had established ties to hydra/shield strike, and was also a hired mercenary to frame superman of genocide in Africa.

so if anyone can handle a UBL assassination cover-up with the seals this is your dude.

even if he cant make eye contact.
 
I wonder why after all the enraged enragement .. why the dems/left/faggots haven't gone to court to press their "easy win" using their superior congressional powers?

Meanwhile Rudy-the tard says a few words about Ukraine and the dems/left/faggots jump before they look and land in their own shit pile.

Then they have the balls to post a headline like this

Trump just succeeded in weaponizing the Justice Department


Sauce for the Goose Mr. Saavik

:rofl:
 
I wonder why after all the enraged enragement .. why the dems/left/faggots haven't gone to court to press their "easy win" using their superior congressional powers?

Meanwhile Rudy-the tard says a few words about Ukraine and the dems/left/faggots jump before they look and land in their own shit pile.

Then they have the balls to post a headline like this

Trump just succeeded in weaponizing the Justice Department


Sauce for the Goose Mr. Saavik

:rofl:



easy for lefties to act twice as virtuous when they have double the standards

DefrK7AU0AAvWJ1.jpg
 
CNN loves hosting Democratic candidates in town halls. Viewers arent returning the affection. - SFGate


If you wanted to watch the herd of Democratic presidential candidates in televised town halls these past few months, CNN has been the place to go.

Week after week, the cable network has given over an hour-plus of prime time to a candidate seeking to challenge President Donald Trump. On one town-hall-happy night last month, it devoted five hours to five of the candidates. A few of the 21 hopefuls have even been featured twice.


Unfortunately for CNN, not many people seem to want to watch televised town halls starring Democratic presidential candidates.
In fact, the opposite has been true. CNN has drawn fewer viewers to its town-hall telecasts than to its usual prime-time lineup of news-discussion programs, which are themselves ratings-challenged. Only four candidates - Harris, Sanders, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg - have drawn more viewers than CNN averages on a typical weeknight, around 1.16 million people.

The rest, at least in television terms, have ranged anywhere from subpar to flaming disasters. Back-to-back town halls featuring Yang and Williamson drew about 310,000 viewers in April, far below the network's modest 907,000 average for all the candidates.

None of its town halls have surpassed regular programming on cable rivals Fox and MSNBC.
 
Why would anyone ever watch a town hall from either party? They're just filled with political insiders masquerading as "real people" asking prescripted questions.
 
Why would anyone ever watch a town hall from either party? They're just filled with political insiders masquerading as "real people" asking prescripted questions.
even worse, prescripted questions that cnn gives to their preferred candidates :lol:
 
:lol:

Alan Dershowitz: McCarthyism comes to Harvard -- Why this should alarm us all

When I was a college student, lawyers who represented Communists would be fired from academic positions. In parts of the South, lawyers who represented civil rights activists were fired. In some areas of the country lawyers who represented men accused of sodomy or women seeking abortions would be fired. Now Harvard College joins this Hall of Shame by firing Professor Ron Sullivan and his wife, Stephanie Robinson from their positions as Co-Deans of Winthrop House because Sullivan decided to represent a man accused of rape. The defendant is the highly controversial Harvey Weinstein, who is presumed innocent and has not yet been tried.

Many troubling arguments have been offered in defense of the decision not to renew Sullivan’s role as Dean of Winthrop house. The most common – and dangerous – is that students feel “unsafe” around a lawyer who is representing Weinstein.

Were Harvard a public university, this benighted decision would be subjected to a constitutional challenge. It still may be subject to challenge under Massachusetts’s law. In any event, it is subject to challenge in the court of public opinion by students, faculty, administrators, and alumni who disagree with Harvard’s decision.

The firing of Dean Sullivan may be the most severe violation of academic freedom I have witnessed in my 55 years at Harvard. It cannot be allowed to stand.
 
so a professor was fired because students didn't like that he was hired as an attorney to defend a guy that did mean things

we literally live in hell
 
Back
Top