I am absolutely in favor of a response for the use of chemical weapons.

ICFire said:
Russian president will ‘consider’ UN strikes on Syria if proved Assad used chemical weapons | euronews, world news
Click to expand...

regime.jpg
 
Last edited:
The next time anyone wants to argue or respond to a clearly fanatical fuck like ICFire, just let this fucktard argue with himself. It's much funnier to watch.

This is what a decade worth of derp and letting someone pretend to vote (since voting clearly doesn't matter) can do for a nation riddled with partisan minded imbeciles.

ICFire said:
..not unilaterally if it can be helped, and I think it will be a coalition of countries that end up responding. However if others lack the backbone I think a response must happen.

We do not want to let that genie out of the bottle.
Click to expand...

2013 w/ Obama

ICFire said:
How much of a moron are you. This is just fucking fantastic, you mean we had approval of the UN? We had military from a broad spectrum of countries join with us or that we had the approval of a coalition of middle eastern countries.
Damn I missed all of that...

:banging:
Click to expand...

2003 w/ Bush

========================================================

ICFire said:
If we're a world leader then yes it is our duty to call on the rest of the world for a response and see it gets done. Syria is a signatory of the CWC as we are.
Click to expand...

2013 w/ Obama

ICFire said:
You just made my point but I'm sure you are bright enough to understand that the US is part of NATO and the UN. Yes American troops were involved but it was not a US Military action. You do understand the difference don't you?
Click to expand...

2003 w/ Bush
========================================================
ICFire said:
So you are in favor of the use of chemical weapons then.
Sheep usually take up the popular stance and I know mine isn't that it is just the logical one.
Click to expand...

2013 w/ Obama

ICFire said:
Doesn't change the fact that it WAS NOT A US MILITARY ACTION for the US to take.
Click to expand...

2003 w/ Bush
============================================================

ICFire said:
If you go down that chemical hill, you also are opening the door for a lot of devastating human nightmares that could easily kill millions all over the world before it was gotten control of or an antidote could be provided for.
Click to expand...

2013 w/ Obama

ICFire said:
I mean the whole fucking war was about oil from the get go and everything that has happened or failed to happened proves it every fucking day.
Click to expand...

2003 w/ Bush

============================================================
ICFire said:
Yeah, lets not respond, allow that door to be breached, such a marvelous idea and we can talk all about how it is the same as bullets and bombs and feel good about ourselves amid the result.
Click to expand...

2013 w/ Obama

ICFire said:
God damnit what part of the Bush administrations claim of "WE HAVE THE EVIDENCE." before the fucking war started can you not grasp.
Click to expand...

2003 w/ Bush

============================================================

ICFire said:
Too old but am a vet and I did volunteer, one of my kids is career Navy though they'll retire this fall.
Click to expand...

2013 w/ Obama

ICFire said:
Well if my daughter had died over there based on his lies I'd have a real problem with that...
Click to expand...

2003 w/ Bush

===============================================================

Source (first 4 pages):

I am absolutely in favor of a response for the use of chemical weapons. by ICFire - Page 15 - TribalWar Forums

2013 w/ Obama

Source (first 12 pages):

Bush will not be re-elected with nation-wide televised debates. by Hugo - Page 12 - TribalWar Forums

2003 w/ Bush
 
Last edited:
cogzinofa said:
US politicians are like steve jobs. it's their opinion that the american public doesn't know what it wants and it's their job to tell the american public what it wants.
Click to expand...

Leave it to cogz, the voter of a bitch like this:



to say something so incredibly dumb and actually mean it.
 
Last edited:
Vanster said:
Congress hasn't had anything to do with US wars since WWII.
Click to expand...

And I'd call every war since then a massive waste of time, money, blood, and something we shouldn't have any part of.

This was just Obama's stance on why GW Bush shouldn't have been able to do what he did in regards to Iraq/Afghanistan.

How times have changed.......:lol:
 
Over 4000 US soliders die in Iraq - captain tryhard votes for Bush

zero US soldiers die in Syria - captain tryhard makes over 4000 posts
 
Dealy learned so much from ten years of bitching about war in Iraq (rightfully so).

That he now wants 40,000 new American deaths in Syria.

Otherwise you are racist and hate Owebama because he is black.
 
This is a level of retardation only matched by the likes of tehvul. Perhaps it is worse?

It doesnt matter if you put boots on the ground or not. An act of war is an act of war.

If your neighbor down the way doesnt like what you do on your property and decides to just blow up some of your property to stop you from doing it again (whether you did it or not), are you going to allow him to do so and its all cool between you both? You will just accept it?

Really?

There's no way in hell we or the russians or the chinese (or other Nations) would ever allow someone to perform a limited strike on us (or those listed above) and not call it an act of war.
 


"How can you talk about what happened if you don't have evidence?" Assad said. "We're not like the American administration. We're not a social media administration. We deal with reality."

:lol:
 
Captain Tele said:
:lol: So very true........

1238899_525740530831581_1037829099_n.jpg
Click to expand...

game over

seriously, how the fuck can he ever blame Bush again???? I mean, the liberal left (and ICFire) will, I just don't understand how the guy can be so against something until he is for it...

oh, he nominated Kerry....

nevermind
 
Nash said:
Click to expand...

Gotta love our so called 'real journalists' in the MSM like Charlie Rose. "But John Kerry says they have evidence, so lets ignore virtually every report that is available by numerous allied sources that suggests Assad is not responsible, and trust government sociopaths that have done nothing but lie to us non-stop and have no reason to withhold the evidence from the public unless they are trying to deceive us." Even many of the congressmen who have been to the confidential security briefings on record have said the evidence they were presented doesn't prove anything and raises more questions than answers. This is the Colin Powell WMD accusations all over again, and the government/MSM thinks the public is idiotic enough to fall for it again.

Assad did not order Syria chemical weapons attack, says German press | World news | The Guardian
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/world/middleeast/russia-syria.html
EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack
Amash unswayed on Syria strike after classified briefing with Obama advisers | MLive.com


(last 2 minutes discusses the security briefing)
 
Sadly the idiots have been falling for it (all over again).....

We should totally trust our CiC this time around. :lol:

What could go wrong (again)?

Despite what every other country is reporting, what the UNSC has said, Obama has all the proof that Assad acted alone inside a top secret security briefing that only a hand full of people are allowed to listen to or discuss.

1006345_526579567414344_1429803704_n.jpg


and this dude talking about it will probably be as well received as Snowden was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top