An apalling political comment, violating commonly held moral values.

Z

Zoolooman

Veteran XV
Followed by an angry post about a tangential topic. As you read the second line, you realize you were baited by my inflammatory subject. As you read the third line, it dawns on you that most people rely on buzzwords and vague abstractions to discuss and justify their political paradigms.

You know that this thread will be empty of thoughtful political discourse.

Despite knowing that you've been duped, you reply to this thread in order to satisfy your pedantic compulsions. You simply cannot ignore a chance to correct someone else. This inevitably brings you into conflict with your actual ideological enemies.

You then engage in horrible pedantism, ignoring the fact that nobody involved is educated enough to properly analyse the subject at hand. Effectively, the man who is nitpicked less and mocks more wins with sheer 'net charisma, however weak his actual arguments.

Random comment about religion.

----------------------------
"The first line of a political signature, containing a misquote, terrible formatting, and/or pretentious drivel that doesn't practically apply to any situation in living experience." -- Attributed to some important sounding guy.

An unnecessary link to your favorite propaganda or pornography.
 
Is this like a "I love the 90's" type thread?

You have to include pics and/or movie clips so we can get a better idea of why we should be amused.
 
Big Monkey said:
Is this like a "I love the 90's" type thread?
Click to expand...

See, here is your first mistake. You begin with such random assumptions about the point and quality of this thread that you miss my point altogether. If you can't see where I'm coming from, I wonder how you can see anything at all!

You have
Click to expand...

One might debate the connotations of have. Does one really have to have anything? Is your materialist view so diehard that you can't accept that sometimes a thread can be complete without the inclusion of capitalist bells and whistles?

to include pics and/or movie clips so we can get a better idea
Click to expand...

Of course you can't get a better idea. Why do I talk politics with people like you?

of why we should be amused.
Click to expand...

The next line is the only serious line in this post: because metathreads amuse me. :]
 
You're cute =]

You make me think of large bunny rabbits

I seriously am wanting to buy one of those rabbits that grow to be gigantic, because they are so cute...and I would definately enjoy playing with it so I can tug on his ginormous ears.
 
OptimaPoint said:
what
Click to expand...

A good question, but I prefer why. It digs past the superficial identity and goes straight to the meaning or purpose.

the fuck
Click to expand...

Your views on human sexuality are incorrect. I've never seen someone so wrong in all my life.

is
Click to expand...

The penultimate identity verb. Defining it can change the course of political history. You need to be less ambiguous in your case: does it equate to an action, a state of being, or the simple existence of a thing?

going on
Click to expand...

I think today's current events are irrelevant to this metathread discussion.
 
joyce.JPG


giant_rabbit.jpg


Awww
 
I found this bunny outside my apartment the other night, no joke
bunny1.jpg


I made him a makeshift shelter. He's a bum.
 
WinterFresh said:
You misspelled "appalling" by the way.
Click to expand...

ya, and i maid several other grammer and stile misstakes which i ignored cuz i didnt even check to see if i made mistakes see? the thread is gonna die be4 the hour is out and then my typo will VANISH. if typos compel u to reply tho well den im gonna PAK dis post with em, seein as dey get youre attention and make u reply more ok?
 
Last edited:
Zelgaddiss said:
i'm replying to this thread in order to satisfy my pedantic compulsions
Click to expand...


I, on the other hand, am replying to this thread in order to satisfy my panoptic compulsions.
 
zoolooman is one of lifes great mysterys

hes like the tootsie pop of our forums

how many licks does it take to get to the existentialism at the core of this avatar
 
Zoolooman said:
Followed by an angry post about a tangential topic. As you read the second line, you realize you were baited by my inflammatory subject. As you read the third line, it dawns on you that most people rely on buzzwords and vague abstractions to discuss and justify their political paradigms.

You know that this thread will be empty of thoughtful political discourse.

Despite knowing that you've been duped, you reply to this thread in order to satisfy your pedantic compulsions. You simply cannot ignore a chance to correct someone else. This inevitably brings you into conflict with your actual ideological enemies.

You then engage in horrible pedantism, ignoring the fact that nobody involved is educated enough to properly analyse the subject at hand. Effectively, the man who is nitpicked less and mocks more wins with sheer 'net charisma, however weak his actual arguments.

Random comment about religion.

----------------------------
"The first line of a political signature, containing a misquote, terrible formatting, and/or pretentious drivel that doesn't practically apply to any situation in living experience." -- Attributed to some important sounding guy.

An unnecessary link to your favorite propaganda or pornography.
Click to expand...

Congrats! TW in a nutshell ..

This thread is now about killer bunny rabbits!!



Cute_Bunny.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top